From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-189.mta1.migadu.com (out-189.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EBFE1F181F for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.189 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772108255; cv=none; b=J2izE7UavQeplIWxCyH/EnCHoACsgX8/RM8i08YxAy2uwDMbVj41b7iSKTbQ45OESMmPC9z1YmCI4mOlDyrFpRdjsElPvDq87xdY8tBiLtFU8yZeTuse4TmxvPGwiM7vwxHqAzlc2JKOQPY4+LCqmy09LCTRvqfc7CodZcQgjGg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772108255; c=relaxed/simple; bh=J0CauotReGtom+w6hSEbxetaIq/O2FJrmGCwZk5QjMI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=R6QBqeRiOmtugqhmC45tWFmdT6w81FG0OAX7FaYLwEkwQnnb/fv7QKzfqk/t2z564HLWVItqve30rUKRqJyV4A3tJmQu3gNmrDI83ICyR+UAI9OlGPuBRHeIXhDKjM4/SOAAWLWrbEkk1wSIKVKwJ2k69dTLre36J2sYAROZgFw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=XWSb94mY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.189 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="XWSb94mY" Message-ID: <321bcf2a-1a38-4a9d-bd0c-15dcd010fb5d@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1772108251; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3r79B4jGU+gUv6qbYfEqycoR/cDElV3OxbWLQtQjD2k=; b=XWSb94mYw/7OQjbkbeEkIuMmYg9iL3Ma3Bn0VbujeXpTyQPYJjrptp3AMLVcmxFfuS0sIN rzdrbheuGr2Mu7yx+uwNq+a/GVPwJuQfbleHKBiJWCSJ30GV3Uz0sRl26gmsDKfeFLLWm9 fjvwMlG/xGkzV2AerqcHvqJi0h8fnm4= Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:17:28 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ptp: ocp: Add support for Xilinx-based Adva TimeCard variant To: Sagi Maimon , jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20260225102938.4131-1-maimon.sagi@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Vadim Fedorenko In-Reply-To: <20260225102938.4131-1-maimon.sagi@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 25/02/2026 10:29, Sagi Maimon wrote: > Add support for the Adva TimeCard model built on a Xilinx-based design. > This patch enables detection and integration of the new hardware within > the existing OCP timecard framework. > > The Xilinx variant relies on the shared driver infrastructure, requiring > only small, targeted additions to accommodate its specific > characteristics. What are exact differences between this card and OCP design which is also Xilinx-based? AFAICS, it's only flash base address and fw tag is different, which can be moved to resource init part.