[PATCH v1 4/4] hwmon: acpi_power_meter: Get rid of ACPICA message printing

Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-05T18:45:10Z

Use acpi_evaluation_failure_warn() introduced previously instead of
the ACPICA-specific ACPI_EXCEPTION() macro to log warning messages
regarding ACPI object evaluation failures and use dev_err() instead
of ACPI_EXCEPTION() to log _PMC package parsing failures, which is
consistent with the other messages printed by the code in question.

Next, drop the ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition only used by the ACPICA
message printing macro.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
#include <linux/acpi.h>

#define ACPI_POWER_METER_NAME "power_meter"
-ACPI_MODULE_NAME(ACPI_POWER_METER_NAME);
#define ACPI_POWER_METER_DEVICE_NAME "Power Meter"
#define ACPI_POWER_METER_CLASS "pwr_meter_resource"

@@ -114,7 +113,8 @@ static int update_avg_interval(struct ac
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_GAI",
NULL, &data);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _GAI"));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_GAI",
+ status);
return -ENODEV;
}

@@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static ssize_t set_avg_interval(struct d
mutex_unlock(&resource->lock);

if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PAI"));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PAI",
+ status);
return -EINVAL;
}

@@ -186,7 +187,8 @@ static int update_cap(struct acpi_power_
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_GHL",
NULL, &data);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _GHL"));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_GHL",
+ status);
return -ENODEV;
}

@@ -237,7 +239,8 @@ static ssize_t set_cap(struct device *de
mutex_unlock(&resource->lock);

if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _SHL"));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_SHL",
+ status);
return -EINVAL;
}

@@ -270,7 +273,8 @@ static int set_acpi_trip(struct acpi_pow
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PTP",
&args, &data);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PTP"));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PTP",
+ status);
return -EINVAL;
}

@@ -322,7 +326,8 @@ static int update_meter(struct acpi_powe
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMM",
NULL, &data);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PMM"));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMM",
+ status);
return -ENODEV;
}

@@ -549,7 +554,8 @@ static int read_domain_devices(struct ac
status = acpi_evaluate_object(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMD", NULL,
&buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PMD"));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMD",
+ status);
return -ENODEV;
}

@@ -745,7 +751,8 @@ static int read_capabilities(struct acpi
status = acpi_evaluate_object(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMC", NULL,
&buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PMC"));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(resource->acpi_dev->handle, "_PMC",
+ status);
return -ENODEV;
}

@@ -765,7 +772,9 @@ static int read_capabilities(struct acpi

status = acpi_extract_package(pss, &format, &state);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Invalid data"));
+ dev_err(&resource->acpi_dev->dev, ACPI_POWER_METER_NAME
+ "_PMC package parsing failed: %s\n",
+ acpi_format_exception(status));
res = -EFAULT;
goto end;
}