From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
saeedm@nvidia.com, gal@nvidia.com, nalramli@fastly.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
"open list:MELLANOX MLX5 core VPI driver"
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] mlx5: Add netdev-genl queue stats
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 13:16:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32495a72-4d41-4b72-84e7-0d86badfd316@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZjxtejIZmJCwLgKC@ubuntu>
On 09/05/2024 9:30, Joe Damato wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:08:39PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 May 2024 01:57:52 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
>>> If I'm following that right and understanding mlx5 (two things I am
>>> unlikely to do simultaneously), that sounds to me like:
>>>
>>> - mlx5e_get_queue_stats_rx and mlx5e_get_queue_stats_tx check if i <
>>> priv->channels.params.num_channels (instead of priv->stats_nch),
>>
>> Yes, tho, not sure whether the "if i < ...num_channels" is even
>> necessary, as core already checks against real_num_rx_queues.
>>
>>> and when
>>> summing mlx5e_sq_stats in the latter function, it's up to
>>> priv->channels.params.mqprio.num_tc instead of priv->max_opened_tc.
>>>
>>> - mlx5e_get_base_stats accumulates and outputs stats for everything from
>>> priv->channels.params.num_channels to priv->stats_nch, and
>>
>> I'm not sure num_channels gets set to 0 when device is down so possibly
>> from "0 if down else ...num_channels" to stats_nch.
>
> Yea, you were right:
>
> if (priv->channels.num == 0)
> i = 0;
> else
> i = priv->channels.params.num_channels;
>
> for (; i < priv->stats_nch; i++) {
>
> Seems to be working now when I adjust the queue count and the test is
> passing as I adjust the queue count up or down. Cool.
>
I agree that get_base should include all inactive queues stats.
But it's not straight forward to implement.
A few guiding points:
Use mlx5e_get_dcb_num_tc(params) for current num_tc.
txq_ix (within the real_num_tx_queues) is calculated by c->ix + tc *
params->num_channels.
The txqsq stats struct is chosen by channel_stats[c->ix]->sq[tc].
It means, in the base stats you should include SQ stats for:
1. all SQs of non-active channels, i.e. ch in [params.num_channels,
priv->stats_nch), tc in [0, priv->max_opened_tc).
2. all SQs of non-active TCs in active channels [0,
params.num_channels), tc in [mlx5e_get_dcb_num_tc(params),
priv->max_opened_tc).
Now I actually see that the patch has issues in mlx5e_get_queue_stats_tx.
You should not loop over all TCs of channel index i.
You must do a reverse mapping from "i" to the pair/tuple [ch_ix, tc],
and then access a single TXQ stats by priv->channel_stats[ch_ix].sq[tc].
> Adding TCs to the NIC triggers the test to fail, so there's still some bug
> in how I'm accumulating stats from the hw TCs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-09 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 2:25 [PATCH net-next 0/1] mlx5: Add netdev-genl queue stats Joe Damato
2024-05-03 2:25 ` [PATCH net-next 1/1] net/mlx5e: Add per queue netdev-genl stats Joe Damato
2024-05-03 10:55 ` [PATCH net-next 0/1] mlx5: Add netdev-genl queue stats Zhu Yanjun
2024-05-03 18:43 ` Joe Damato
2024-05-03 21:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-03 23:53 ` Joe Damato
2024-05-04 0:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-06 18:04 ` Joe Damato
2024-05-08 21:40 ` Tariq Toukan
2024-05-08 23:24 ` Joe Damato
2024-05-09 0:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-09 1:57 ` Joe Damato
2024-05-09 2:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-09 4:11 ` Joe Damato
2024-05-09 6:30 ` Joe Damato
2024-05-09 10:16 ` Tariq Toukan [this message]
2024-05-09 23:14 ` Joe Damato
2024-05-10 0:31 ` Joe Damato
2024-05-10 4:27 ` Joe Damato
2024-05-09 9:42 ` Tariq Toukan
2024-05-09 23:06 ` Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32495a72-4d41-4b72-84e7-0d86badfd316@gmail.com \
--to=ttoukan.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nalramli@fastly.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox