public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v0.1 1/6] PM: EM: Move perf rebuilding function from schedutil to EM
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 17:36:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3263759.5fSG56mABF@rjwysocki.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3607404.iIbC2pHGDl@rjwysocki.net>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The sugov_eas_rebuild_sd() function defined in the schedutil cpufreq
governor implements generic functionality that may be useful in other
places.  In particular, going forward it will be used in the intel_pstate
driver.

For this reason, move it from schedutil to the energy model code and
rename it to em_rebuild_perf_domains().

This also involves getting rid of some #ifdeffery in schedutil which
is a plus.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/energy_model.h     |    2 ++
 kernel/power/energy_model.c      |   17 +++++++++++++++++
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c |   33 ++++++---------------------------
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/kernel/power/energy_model.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -908,3 +908,20 @@ int em_update_performance_limits(struct
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_update_performance_limits);
+
+static void rebuild_sd_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	rebuild_sched_domains_energy();
+}
+
+static DECLARE_WORK(rebuild_sd_work, rebuild_sd_workfn);
+
+void em_rebuild_perf_domains(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * When called from the cpufreq_register_driver() path, the
+	 * cpu_hotplug_lock is already held, so use a work item to
+	 * avoid nested locking in rebuild_sched_domains().
+	 */
+	schedule_work(&rebuild_sd_work);
+}
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -604,31 +604,6 @@ static const struct kobj_type sugov_tuna
 
 /********************** cpufreq governor interface *********************/
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL
-static void rebuild_sd_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
-{
-	rebuild_sched_domains_energy();
-}
-
-static DECLARE_WORK(rebuild_sd_work, rebuild_sd_workfn);
-
-/*
- * EAS shouldn't be attempted without sugov, so rebuild the sched_domains
- * on governor changes to make sure the scheduler knows about it.
- */
-static void sugov_eas_rebuild_sd(void)
-{
-	/*
-	 * When called from the cpufreq_register_driver() path, the
-	 * cpu_hotplug_lock is already held, so use a work item to
-	 * avoid nested locking in rebuild_sched_domains().
-	 */
-	schedule_work(&rebuild_sd_work);
-}
-#else
-static inline void sugov_eas_rebuild_sd(void) { };
-#endif
-
 struct cpufreq_governor schedutil_gov;
 
 static struct sugov_policy *sugov_policy_alloc(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
@@ -783,7 +758,11 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_pol
 	if (ret)
 		goto fail;
 
-	sugov_eas_rebuild_sd();
+	/*
+	 * EAS shouldn't be attempted without sugov, so rebuild the sched_domains
+	 * on governor changes to make sure the scheduler knows about it.
+	 */
+	em_rebuild_perf_domains();
 
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
@@ -827,7 +806,7 @@ static void sugov_exit(struct cpufreq_po
 	sugov_policy_free(sg_policy);
 	cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
 
-	sugov_eas_rebuild_sd();
+	em_rebuild_perf_domains();
 }
 
 static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/energy_model.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/energy_model.h
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ int em_dev_compute_costs(struct device *
 int em_dev_update_chip_binning(struct device *dev);
 int em_update_performance_limits(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 		unsigned long freq_min_khz, unsigned long freq_max_khz);
+void em_rebuild_perf_domains(void);
 
 /**
  * em_pd_get_efficient_state() - Get an efficient performance state from the EM
@@ -404,6 +405,7 @@ int em_update_performance_limits(struct
 {
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
+static inline void em_rebuild_perf_domains(void) {}
 #endif
 
 #endif




  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-08 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-08 16:09 [RFC][PATCH v0.1 0/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Enable EAS on hybrid platforms without SMT Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-08 16:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2024-11-08 16:37 ` [RFC][PATCH v0.1 2/6] PM: EM: Call em_compute_costs() from em_create_perf_table() Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-12  8:21   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-11-08 16:38 ` [RFC][PATCH v0.1 3/6] PM: EM: Add special case to em_dev_register_perf_domain() Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-12  8:21   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-11-18 15:24   ` Hongyan Xia
2024-11-19 13:51     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-08 16:40 ` [RFC][PATCH v0.1 4/6] PM: EM: Introduce em_dev_expand_perf_domain() Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-08 16:41 ` [RFC][PATCH v0.1 5/6] sched/topology: Allow .setpolicy() cpufreq drivers to enable EAS Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-11 11:54   ` Christian Loehle
2024-11-11 13:54     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-19 15:13       ` Vincent Guittot
2024-11-19 17:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-19 19:28         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-08 16:46 ` [RFC][PATCH v0.1 6/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add basic EAS support on hybrid platforms Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-12  8:21   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-11-19 14:38     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-18 16:34   ` Pierre Gondois
2024-11-19 17:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-16 15:32       ` Pierre Gondois
2024-12-16 17:25         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3263759.5fSG56mABF@rjwysocki.net \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox