From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@linux-nfs.org, security@kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1][BUG][TAKE2] KEYRINGS: find_keyring_by_name() can gain the freed keyring
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:47:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32722.1272293268@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100426232234.5c210566.toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> OK. I understand. So, your patch looks fine to me.
> ---
> Once find_keyring_by_name() returns -ENOKEY, the new user creates a
> new key. So, both the deleting key and the new key may exist.
> Therefore at next find_keyring_by_name() call, we should find the new
> key and ignore the deleting key.
> ---
>
> Today, I tested your patch and any problem didn't happen.
> So, I rewrote your patch. Here you are:
Thanks.
Note that the vertical lines in the right-hand column of your timeline don't
seem to line up correctly. Are you editing it in an editor with a
proportional font?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-22 7:37 [PATCH 1/1][BUG][IMPORTANT] KEYRINGS: find_keyring_by_name() can gain the freed keyring Toshiyuki Okajima
2010-04-22 10:16 ` David Howells
2010-04-23 10:45 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2010-04-23 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/1][BUG][TAKE2] " Toshiyuki Okajima
2010-04-23 11:33 ` David Howells
2010-04-23 15:23 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2010-04-23 15:52 ` David Howells
2010-04-24 0:32 ` 岡嶋 寿行
2010-04-26 14:22 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2010-04-26 14:47 ` David Howells [this message]
2010-04-26 10:57 ` David Howells
2010-04-26 14:42 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2010-04-29 11:23 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32722.1272293268@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=keyrings@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox