From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Has slab ctor operation changed? -- was [PATCH 1/1] afs: afs_alloc_inode: use kmem_cache_zalloc
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:23:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32740.1392934995@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140220211612.506074a7fd876e47130a8c5c@skynet.be>
Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> wrote:
> afs_vnode is currently cleared with 2 memsets after allocation and
> 1 in constructor (afs_i_init_once).
> -This patch calls zalloc for explicit zero fill.
Ummm... This patch isn't necessarily correct in the substantiative portions.
Since afs_i_init_once() is called by the slab allocator during the course of
kmem_cache_alloc(), how does kmem_cache_zalloc() interact with that?
IIRC, it used to be that the ctor() function was called when the pages were
allocated to the slab - and it wasn't called again, even if the object was
allocated, deallocated and reallocated. This means that things like locks and
lists don't need reinitialising after allocation.
So afs_i_init_once() theoretically constructs the stuff that can be reused,
and afs_alloc_inode() therefore has to clear the non-reusable state.
Of course, it's possible that the slab allocator no longer works like this...
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-20 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-20 13:16 [PATCH 1/1] afs: afs_alloc_inode: use kmem_cache_zalloc Fabian Frederick
2014-02-20 21:30 ` Joe Perches
2014-02-20 22:03 ` David Howells
2014-02-20 22:23 ` David Howells [this message]
2014-02-20 21:47 ` Has slab ctor operation changed? -- was " Fabian Frederick
2014-02-21 0:19 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-24 19:52 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32740.1392934995@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fabf@skynet.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox