From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI: scan: Make acpi_processor_add() check the device enabled bit
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:40:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3283809.44csPzL39Z@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6021126.lOV4Wx5bFT@kreacher>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Modify acpi_processor_add() return an error if _STA returns the enabled
bit clear for the given processor device, so as to avoid using processors
that don't decode their resources, as per the ACPI specification. [1]
Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/06_Device_Configuration.html#sta-device-status # [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
* Move acpi_device_is_enabled() to this patch.
* Change patch ordering.
* Do not check the "functional" _STA bit in acpi_device_is_present().
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 3 +++
drivers/acpi/internal.h | 1 +
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/internal.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/internal.h
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/internal.h
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ int acpi_device_setup_files(struct acpi_
void acpi_device_remove_files(struct acpi_device *dev);
void acpi_device_add_finalize(struct acpi_device *device);
void acpi_free_pnp_ids(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp);
+bool acpi_device_is_enabled(const struct acpi_device *adev);
bool acpi_device_is_present(const struct acpi_device *adev);
bool acpi_device_is_battery(struct acpi_device *adev);
bool acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev,
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -381,6 +381,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acp
struct device *dev;
int result = 0;
+ if (!acpi_device_is_enabled(device))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
pr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_processor), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pr)
return -ENOMEM;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1945,6 +1945,11 @@ bool acpi_device_is_present(const struct
return adev->status.present || adev->status.functional;
}
+bool acpi_device_is_enabled(const struct acpi_device *adev)
+{
+ return adev->status.present && adev->status.enabled;
+}
+
static bool acpi_scan_handler_matching(struct acpi_scan_handler *handler,
const char *idstr,
const struct acpi_device_id **matchid)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-26 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-26 16:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI: scan: Check enabled _STA bit on Bus/Device Checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: scan: Fix device check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ACPI: scan: Relocate acpi_bus_trim_one() Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2024-02-27 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI: scan: Make acpi_processor_add() check the device enabled bit Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-27 11:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI: scan: Rework Device Check and Bus Check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 9:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-26 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: scan: Consolidate " Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 9:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3283809.44csPzL39Z@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox