From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Danielle Constantino <dcostantino@meta.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH slab/for-next-fixes v2 0/3] mm/slab: fix unbounded recursion in free path with memalloc profiling
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:07:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32a056e2-e641-4aaa-887e-586d997feefc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710-kmalloc-no-objext-v2-0-2709afb6a030@kernel.org>
On 7/10/26 08:03, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote:
> This is a follow-up fix after the recent discussion [1].
> See patch 2 for the detailed description on the bug.
>
> Based on slab/for-next-fixes (72bb229f916) and will be soon available
> at git.kernel.org [2].
>
> Instead preventing cycles by bumping up the allocation size of obj_exts
> arrays, it introduces a new kmalloc type called KMALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT and
> disallow formation of cycles between kmalloc types when allocating
> obj_exts arrays. obj_exts arrays of normal kmalloc caches are served
> from KMALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT caches (that don't have obj_exts), and all other
> obj_exts arrays are served from normal kmalloc caches.
Since we agreed to investigate later whether it makes sense to start
allocating all obj_ext allocations from the new type, I wonder if for now we
should not create them at all if they won't be used - if anything to avoid
polluting slabinfo. AFAIU that means only create them with mem alloc
profiling is config-enabled and mem_profiling_support == true?
(Or probably also with SLUB_TINY && MEMCG, as nonsensical as it is...)
> I tried to reuse SLAB_ALLOC_NO_RECURSE to make kmalloc_slab() select
> KMALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT, but it was not great because it does not allow
> sheaves for those caches. So I introduced a new slab alloc flag
> SLAB_ALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT.
>
> To avoid huge confusion, I had to decouple "disallowing sheaves"
> semantics from SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT and introduced SLAB_NO_SHEAVES.
>
> While this cannot be directly backported to v6.18 and v6.12 due to lack
> of SLAB_ALLOC_* flags and kmalloc_flags(), I don't this will be
> particularily challenging to backport it. Instead of a new slab alloc
> flag, we can use __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT to select KMALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT as
> kmalloc caches don't have sheaves in v6.18 anyway.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/9a139365-28e6-4f1e-b35b-7f6091e9aa14@kernel.org
>
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/harry/linux.git/log/?h=kmalloc-no-objext-v2r2
>
> [ "v2r2" because after exposing v2r1 I adjusted some of Vlastimil's
> feedback and fixed a memory leak due to bootstrapping twice when
> kmalloc caches are aliased ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix a memory leak when kmalloc caches are aliased (patch 1).
> This is included as part of this series as patch 3 makes it
> easier to trigger the leak.
>
> - Fix a warning in MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG by dropping
> mark_obj_codetag_empty() for obj_exts. Sashiko raised this and
> I reproduced it and confirmed that the warnings are gone.
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260702-kmalloc-no-objext-v1-0-167175008538%40kernel.org
>
> - Added R-b from Vlastimil on patch 2, thanks!
> - Adjusted Vlastimil's feedback on RFC v1
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260702-kmalloc-no-objext-v1-0-167175008538@kernel.org
>
> ---
> Harry Yoo (Oracle) (3):
> mm/slab: fix a memory leak due to bootstrapping sheaves twice
> mm/slab: decouple SLAB_NO_SHEAVES from SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT
> mm/slab: prevent unbounded recursion in free path with new kmalloc type
>
> include/linux/slab.h | 16 +++++++-
> mm/slab.h | 15 +++++--
> mm/slab_common.c | 18 ++++++++-
> mm/slub.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 72bb229f9161a1efcd5df32141b69fcc6ae81a13
> change-id: 20260702-kmalloc-no-objext-2619c1e06083
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 6:03 [PATCH slab/for-next-fixes v2 0/3] mm/slab: fix unbounded recursion in free path with memalloc profiling Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-10 6:03 ` [PATCH slab/for-next-fixes v2 1/3] mm/slab: fix a memory leak due to bootstrapping sheaves twice Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-10 6:03 ` [PATCH slab/for-next-fixes v2 2/3] mm/slab: decouple SLAB_NO_SHEAVES from SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-10 6:03 ` [PATCH slab/for-next-fixes v2 3/3] mm/slab: prevent unbounded recursion in free path with new kmalloc type Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-10 13:07 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-07-10 13:44 ` [PATCH slab/for-next-fixes v2 0/3] mm/slab: fix unbounded recursion in free path with memalloc profiling Harry Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32a056e2-e641-4aaa-887e-586d997feefc@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dcostantino@meta.com \
--cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox