From: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping]
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:19:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3364571.STeM6x1sE0@agathebauer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170621124829.GM13640@kernel.org>
On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 14:48:29 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> > On Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 03:07:39 CEST Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Hi Millian, can I take this as an Acked-by or Tested-by?
> >
> > I have no access to any PowerPC hardware. In principle the code looks
> > fine, but that's all I can say here.
>
> Ok, that would count as an Acked-by, i.e. from
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
>
> -------------------------
>
> Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker
> has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. Hence patch
> mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me"
> into an Acked-by: (but note that it is usually better to ask for an
> explicit ack).
>
> -------------------------
>
> If you had a ppc machine _and_ had applied and tested the patch, that
> would allow us to use a Tested-by tag.
I see, I'm still unfamiliar with this process. But yes, do consider it an
`Acked-by` from my side then.
Cheers
--
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-21 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-01 10:24 [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-09 12:30 ` [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc [ping] Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-12 11:58 ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-06-13 11:44 ` Mark Wielaard
2017-06-13 15:55 ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-06-15 8:46 ` Milian Wolff
2017-06-15 11:16 ` Mark Wielaard
2017-06-16 4:21 ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-06-21 1:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-21 1:31 ` Mark Wielaard
2017-06-21 1:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-21 8:16 ` Milian Wolff
2017-06-21 12:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-21 14:19 ` Milian Wolff [this message]
2017-06-21 14:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-15 12:13 ` [PATCH v2] perf: libdw support for powerpc Jiri Olsa
2017-06-20 21:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-21 18:19 ` [tip:perf/core] perf unwind: Support " tip-bot for Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3364571.STeM6x1sE0@agathebauer \
--to=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox