From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: fix corruption in fat_alloc_new_dir()
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 15:06:28 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <339755031.10549626.1567969588805.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v9u3xf5q.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp>
----- Original Message -----
> Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > sb_getblk does not guarantee that buffer_head is uptodate. If there is
> > async read running in parallel for same buffer_head, it can overwrite
> > just initialized msdos_dir_entry, leading to corruption:
> > FAT-fs (loop0): error, corrupted directory (invalid entries)
> > FAT-fs (loop0): Filesystem has been set read-only
> >
> > This can happen for example during LTP statx04, which creates loop
> > device, formats it (mkfs.vfat), mounts it and immediately creates
> > a new directory. In parallel, systemd-udevd is probing new block
> > device, which leads to async read.
> >
> > do_mkdirat ksys_read
> > vfs_mkdir vfs_read
> > vfat_mkdir __vfs_read
> > fat_alloc_new_dir new_sync_read
> > /* init de[0], de[1] */ blkdev_read_iter
> > generic_file_read_iter
> > generic_file_buffered_read
> > blkdev_readpage
> > block_read_full_page
> >
> > Faster reproducer (based on LTP statx04):
> >
> > int main(void)
> > {
> > int i, j, ret, fd, loop_fd, ctrl_fd;
> > int loop_num;
> > char loopdev[256], tmp[256], testfile[256];
> >
> > mkdir("/tmp/mntpoint", 0777);
> > for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> > printf("Iteration: %d\n", i);
> > sprintf(testfile, "/tmp/test.img.%d", getpid());
> >
> > ctrl_fd = open("/dev/loop-control", O_RDWR);
> > loop_num = ioctl(ctrl_fd, LOOP_CTL_GET_FREE);
> > close(ctrl_fd);
> > sprintf(loopdev, "/dev/loop%d", loop_num);
> >
> > fd = open(testfile, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0600);
> > fallocate(fd, 0, 0, 256*1024*1024);
> > close(fd);
> >
> > fd = open(testfile, O_RDWR);
> > loop_fd = open(loopdev, O_RDWR);
> > ioctl(loop_fd, LOOP_SET_FD, fd);
> > close(loop_fd);
> > close(fd);
> >
> > sprintf(tmp, "mkfs.vfat %s", loopdev);
> > system(tmp);
> > mount(loopdev, "/tmp/mntpoint", "vfat", 0, NULL);
> >
> > for (j = 0; j < 200; j++) {
> > sprintf(tmp, "/tmp/mntpoint/testdir%d", j);
> > ret = mkdir(tmp, 0777);
> > if (ret) {
> > perror("mkdir");
> > break;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > umount("/tmp/mntpoint");
> > loop_fd = open(loopdev, O_RDWR);
> > ioctl(loop_fd, LOOP_CLR_FD, fd);
> > close(loop_fd);
> > unlink(testfile);
> >
> > if (ret)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > Issue triggers within minute on HPE Apollo 70 (arm64, 64GB RAM, 224 CPUs).
>
> Using the device while mounting same device doesn't work reliably like
> this race. (getblk() is intentionally used to get the buffer to write
> new data.)
Are you saying this is expected even if 'usage' is just read?
>
> mount(2) internally opens the device by EXCL mode, so I guess udev opens
> without EXCL (I dont know if it is intent or not).
I gave this a try and added O_EXCL to udev-builtin-blkid.c. My system had trouble
booting, it was getting stuck on mounting LVM volumes.
So, I'm not sure how to move forward here.
Regards,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-08 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-02 23:59 [PATCH] fat: fix corruption in fat_alloc_new_dir() Jan Stancek
2019-09-08 10:20 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2019-09-08 19:06 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-09-10 3:53 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2019-09-10 16:27 ` Jan Stancek
2019-09-11 6:55 ` [PATCH] fat: Workaround the race with userspace's read via blockdev while mounting OGAWA Hirofumi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=339755031.10549626.1567969588805.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox