From: Nazar Kazakov <nazar.kazakov@codethink.co.uk>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf jevents: make events order more deterministic
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 20:08:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33e2fcf9b93f39e9e75e80b1af1bdb1c@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fWm8q6EX29hY33xoDNFJYoGOB4GnsLkXarUFzsoUZVEqg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2026-07-06 19:48, Ian Rogers wrote:
> I see the problem from your example. I wonder a more complete fix
> would be something like:
> ```
> def __lt__(self, other):
> """Sort order."""
> if self.name != other.name:
> return self.name < other.name
> if not self.expr.Equals(other.expr):
> return self.expr.ToPerfJson() < other.expr.ToPerfJson()
> return self.description < other.description
> ```
> wdyt?
Yep, your code looks better. Also Sashiko AI tool found an embarrasing
bug in mine
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706175624.692736-1-nazar.kazakov@codethink.co.uk?part=1
So let's go with yours :)
Thanks,
Nazar Kazakov
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 17:56 [PATCH] perf jevents: make events order more deterministic Nazar Kazakov
2026-07-06 18:04 ` Ian Rogers
2026-07-06 18:22 ` Nazar Kazakov
2026-07-06 18:48 ` Ian Rogers
2026-07-06 19:08 ` Nazar Kazakov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33e2fcf9b93f39e9e75e80b1af1bdb1c@codethink.co.uk \
--to=nazar.kazakov@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox