From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B498634C for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 18:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775585929; cv=none; b=hD3zUMNNGxlqXhjCR4xyJGjoD7L78EX02U/INvrcUDTndpoHoZSWgF2LvxOnINBaFe61hhA/KgB+i9Ez/++PkfP2h6lWPN/USiInAeYYNLgORAM43eC4pKyE58GsjMLLf9XLXE3CmMfTVJgUWSeqIe+laKjCVBTAv7oaRdhprzI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775585929; c=relaxed/simple; bh=M2u1374IM3CJT7oS4ect2lU0QNqXtcMthCczFfjzZP0=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=oYE7MLGIVpRgZ6RBWoEZ1s7ZMRxpSgV+SVoogYB0elaP0JQv4wrQrGA9YHovaoXNtNM4qfAn2Z3/y9CpUweAzDSSRAkuuNdCwKi40erELISFd/d2JQwa1Si6VAI/FM4pk6FgGGICyZM3Fq3EN3GqdCNth4TOmy7MEdEzl3/dQlk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QjNZVjmK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QjNZVjmK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BE24C116C6; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 18:18:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1775585929; bh=M2u1374IM3CJT7oS4ect2lU0QNqXtcMthCczFfjzZP0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QjNZVjmK1xMog+0X5j88hv9zxB1J4DwsGnqunYmyvRXnyfvHA51UfMXzHRsVRwybj 69xun2kXtAYinSTA8G6dcSfWtaZ9UdJZZWabYShm7+nKylVufzmOFevze8uy15nmlN Qs++BL66/oriLWyb35IuWx5H7SL1znbNMJg0ozIt2SDM99girg9OJzvXaxRQk9szMu 1C5MsbDv4ORnZdB59NdsJGu9wYwsnDe/+gr2bG9RFcpgDKcA2NCMjy2e1NH7bLDMUW KaDv0m7UzrGenqgk18XgEtI+u4+a/alc6w4lnoGmllV9SFXx+jRgx4etg2g4UW4/fw PpW6pNY3S3tKA== Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 08:18:48 -1000 Message-ID: <33f9d3141b1cb3eb7d1f0f0327ddcf9f@kernel.org> From: Tejun Heo To: Maninder Singh Cc: jiangshanlai@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] workqueue: use NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS instead of hardcoded value In-Reply-To: <20260407034215.3004359-1-maninder1.s@samsung.com> References: <20260407034215.3004359-1-maninder1.s@samsung.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hello, On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 09:12:15AM +0530, Maninder Singh wrote: > use NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS for irq_work_fns[] array definition. > NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS is also 2, but better to use MACRO. > Initialization loop for_each_bh_worker_pool() also uses same MACRO. Applied to wq/for-7.1 with a small formatting tweak so the longer declaration doesn't leave the initializer misaligned: void (*irq_work_fns[NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS])(struct irq_work *) = { bh_pool_kick_normal, bh_pool_kick_highpri }; Thanks. -- tejun