public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] IB/hns: Replace counting semaphore event_sem with wait_event
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:21:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3400101.E3rphEBHnx@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHv-k__yWEaBhNYqvdjZPFpVtMKGMC75_eMh7Y4V_=MNhtzMbw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 6:29:45 PM CEST Binoy Jayan wrote:
> On 25 October 2016 at 17:58, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 5:31:57 PM CEST Binoy Jayan wrote:
> >>  static int __hns_roce_cmd_mbox_wait(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u64 in_param,
> >>                                     u64 out_param, unsigned long in_modifier,
> >> @@ -198,11 +218,12 @@ static int __hns_roce_cmd_mbox_wait(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u64 in_param,
> >>         struct hns_roce_cmdq *cmd = &hr_dev->cmd;
> >>         struct device *dev = &hr_dev->pdev->dev;
> >>         struct hns_roce_cmd_context *context;
> >> -       int ret = 0;
> >> +       int orig_free_head, ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> +       wait_event(cmd->wq, (orig_free_head = atomic_free_node(cmd, -1)) != -1);
> >>
> >>         spin_lock(&cmd->context_lock);
> >> -       WARN_ON(cmd->free_head < 0);
> >> -       context = &cmd->context[cmd->free_head];
> >> +       context = &cmd->context[orig_free_head];
> >>         context->token += cmd->token_mask + 1;
> >>         cmd->free_head = context->next;
> >>         spin_unlock(&cmd->context_lock);
> >>
> >
> > You get the lock in atomic_free_node() and then again right after that.
> > Why not combine the two and only take the lock inside of that
> > function that returns a context?
> 
> 
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> I couldn't figure out a way to wait for a node to be free followed by
> acquiring a lock
> in an atomic fashion. If the lock is acquired after the wait_event,
> there could be race
> between the wait_event and acquiring the lock. If the lock is acquired
> before the
> wait_event, the process may goto sleep with the lock held which is not desired.
> Could you suggest me of some way to circumvent this?

Something like

static struct hns_roce_cmd_context *hns_roce_try_get_context(struct hns_roce_cmdq *cmd)
{
	struct hns_roce_cmd_context *context = NULL;

	spin_lock(&cmd->context_lock);

	if (cmd->free_head < 0)
		goto out;

	context = &cmd->context[cmd->free_head];

	... /* update free_head */

out:
	spin_unlock(&cmd->context_lock);

	return context;
}
...

static struct hns_roce_cmd_context *hns_roce_get_context(struct hns_roce_cmdq *cmd)
{
	struct hns_roce_cmd_context *context;

	wait_event(cmd->wq, (context = hns_roce_try_get_context(cmd)));

	return context;
}

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-25 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-25 12:01 [PATCH v2 0/8] infiniband: Remove semaphores Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] IB/core: iwpm_nlmsg_request: Replace semaphore with completion Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] IB/core: Replace semaphore sm_sem " Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:43   ` Jack Wang
2016-10-25 15:08     ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 15:48       ` Jack Wang
2016-10-25 15:48       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-25 20:15         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] IB/hns: Replace semaphore poll_sem with mutex Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] IB/mthca: " Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] IB/isert: Replace semaphore sem with completion Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] IB/hns: Replace counting semaphore event_sem with wait_event Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:28   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 12:59     ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 13:21       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-10-25 13:35         ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] IB/mthca: " Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] IB/mlx5: Add helper mlx5_ib_post_send_wait Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:23   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 12:46     ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:26   ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-10-25 13:16     ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27  6:05       ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-10-27  6:23         ` Binoy Jayan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3400101.E3rphEBHnx@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=binoy.jayan@linaro.org \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox