Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix __show_regs output timestamps

From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix __show_regs output timestamps
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 09:27:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3401f323-a4fa-a636-e032-d033ad059646@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493857488.22125.31.camel@perches.com>

On 04/05/17 01:24, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 22:30 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:44:11PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 20:23 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:39:49AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>> Multiple line formats are not preferred as the second and
>>>>> subsequent lines may not have timestamps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lacking timestamps makes reading the output a bit difficult.
>>>>> This also makes arm/arm64 output more similar.
>>>>>
>>>>> Previous:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 1514.093231] pc : [<bf79c304>]    lr : [<bf79ced8>]    psr: a00f0013
>>>>> sp : ecdd7e20  ip : 00000000  fp : ffffffff
>>>>>
>>>>> New:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 1514.093231] pc : [<bf79c304>]    lr : [<bf79ced8>]    psr: a00f0013
>>>>> [ 1514.105316] sp : ecdd7e20  ip : 00000000  fp : ffffffff
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>>
>>>> Could you put this in my patch system please, I'm unlikely to remember to
>>>> apply it otherwise if not already there (massive email backlog.)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Your patch system bounced my perfectly formatted patch
>>> because your system wants totally unnecessary additional
>>> information specific to your workflow.
>>>
>>> No thanks, I don't need the additional work just to
>>> please your system and neither should anyone else.
>>
>> Don't expect me to remember to apply your patch then.  I've got days of
>> catch up, and I'm just not going to remember.  Sorry.
> 
> <shrug>
> 
> If your systems require special handling on the
> part of patch submitters, you should document it
> in the kernel tree.
> 
> Better, someone else should find the time to apply
> properly formatted patches.
> 

Joe, I find this patch handy, so I've uploaded it into Russell's patch system
on your behalf and it has been accepted as patch 8673/1.

Cheers
Vladimir

> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 