From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752719Ab2GDNie (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:38:34 -0400 Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26]:34194 "EHLO sam.nabble.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751895Ab2GDNid (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:38:33 -0400 Message-ID: <34113132.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT) From: IamTrying To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Linux kernel or Hurd or Plan9front? Google damaged spoiled linux kernel too finally? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: iamtrying.test@gmail.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org http://pastehtml.com/view/c3kw80dyq.html - Do you know the new 2012 list? 1) How many Linux core kernel developer left now and working as stable? 2) http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/operating-systems/linux/ - This guy also works in Google What is the future of Linux kernel? OR should everyone contribute to Hurd and Plan9front? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Linux-kernel-or-Hurd-or-Plan9front--Google-damaged-spoiled-linux-kernel-too-finally--tp34113132p34113132.html Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.