public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_* symbols in UAPI headers?
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 19:17:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3479.1554833845@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a13NVbkJzzoZG_7HrDT9qGPR5ptbRUL=xH1oZ1a+5ksHw@mail.gmail.com>

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> > I just stumbled over the MAP_UNINITIALIZED defintion, initially
> > added by:
> >
> > commit ea637639591def87a54cea811cbac796980cb30d
> > Author: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com>
> > Date:   Mon Dec 14 18:00:02 2009 -0800
> >
> >     nommu: fix malloc performance by adding uninitialized flag
> >
> > The defintion depends on CONFIG_MMAP_ALLOW_UNINITIALIZED, which
> > will never be set by userspace.  How is this supposed to work?
> >
> > Shoudn't we define the symbol unconditionally and just turn it
> > into a no-op in the implementation?

Yes.

> Right, good catch. That should work. It can probably be done
> by adding another check before the conditional, like:
> 
>        /* clear anonymous mappings that don't ask for uninitialized data */
>        if (!vma->vm_file &&
>            !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMAP_ALLOW_UNINITIALIZED) &&
>              (flags & MAP_UNINITIALIZED))
>                memset((void *)region->vm_start, 0,
>                       region->vm_end - region->vm_start);

Sounds good.

> > There are a few similar issues, like struct elf_prstatus having
> > a different layout depending on CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_FDPIC, or
> > MAX_SHARED_LIBS defending on CONFIG_BINFMT_SHARED_FLAT.

Because the kernel code uses that header and that struct too, so you'd break
compilation of binfmt_elf_fdpic.c.  There is a way round it - and that's to
copy the struct into the non-UAPI backing header and delete the conditional
section from the UAPI one.  You'd have to stop the non-UAPI header from
#including the UAPI header, though, and you'd have to hope that no one is
trying to set it in userspace (gdb doesn't).

David

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-09 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-08 12:46 CONFIG_* symbols in UAPI headers? Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-08 13:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-09 18:17   ` David Howells [this message]
2019-04-09 19:11 ` Paul Bolle
2019-04-09 20:54   ` Paul Bolle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3479.1554833845@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jie.zhang@analog.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox