From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>, Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NUMA scheduler BK tree
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:40:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <347990000.1037648441@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200211061734.42713.efocht@ess.nec.de>
> in order to make it easier to keep up with the main Linux tree I've
> set up a bitkeeper repository with our NUMA scheduler at
> bk://numa-ef.bkbits.net/numa-sched
> (Web view: http://numa-ef.bkbits.net/)
> This used to contain my node affine NUMA scheduler, I'll add extra
> trees when the additional patches for that are tested on top of our
> NUMA scheduler.
>
> Is it ok for you to have it this way or would you prefer having the
> core and the initial load balancer separate?
>
> The tree is currently in sync with bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 and
> I'll try to keep so.
BTW, can you keep producing normal patches too, when you do an update?
I don't use bitkeeper ...
Thanks,
Martin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-18 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-06 16:34 NUMA scheduler BK tree Erich Focht
2002-11-06 18:10 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-11-07 23:05 ` Erich Focht
2002-11-07 23:46 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-11-08 16:57 ` Erich Focht
2002-11-11 15:13 ` [PATCH 2.5.47] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Erich Focht
2002-11-11 15:14 ` [PATCH 2.5.47] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-11-12 0:24 ` [PATCH 2.5.47] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Michael Hohnbaum
2002-11-18 19:40 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-11-19 16:26 ` [PATCH 2.5.48] " Erich Focht
2002-11-19 16:27 ` [PATCH 2.5.48] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-02 15:29 ` [PATCH 2.5.50] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-02 15:30 ` [PATCH 2.5.50] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-06 17:39 ` [PATCH 2.5.50] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Michael Hohnbaum
2002-12-18 16:21 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] " Erich Focht
2002-12-18 16:23 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-20 14:49 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler: cputimes stats Erich Focht
2002-12-20 15:17 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-20 17:44 ` Erich Focht
2002-12-31 13:29 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (1/3) Erich Focht
2002-12-31 13:29 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (2/3) Erich Focht
2002-12-31 13:30 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (3/3) Erich Focht
2003-01-04 1:58 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (1/3) Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-05 5:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-06 3:58 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-06 6:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-07 2:23 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-07 11:27 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-07 23:35 ` Michael Hohnbaum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=347990000.1037648441@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=efocht@ess.nec.de \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox