From: Wu Fengguang <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: [minor fix] radixtree: regulate tag get return value
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 19:17:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <349419864.11444@ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
Message-ID: <20060604111754.GA5984@mail.ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060604021105.1ce7d727.akpm@osdl.org>
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 02:11:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:45:48 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:
>
> > Andrew, this small patch makes the radixtree tester program from
> > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/rtth.tar.gz
> > run OK, with the latest radix tree code in linux-2.6.17-rc5-mm2.
> >
> > It regulates the return value to 0/1 for functions
> > radix_tree_tag_get() and radix_tree_tagged().
> >
>
> Well yes. But it slows down the kernel. It would be better to fix rtth.
OK. I'll send an updated patch to directly fix the for-rtth radix_tree_tag_get().
> > ---
> >
> > --- linux.orig/lib/radix-tree.c
> > +++ linux/lib/radix-tree.c
> > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static inline void tag_clear(struct radi
> > static inline int tag_get(struct radix_tree_node *node, unsigned int tag,
> > int offset)
> > {
> > - return test_bit(offset, node->tags[tag]);
> > + return !! test_bit(offset, node->tags[tag]);
> > }
>
> test_bit() is (sadly) defined to return 0 or 1. Did this really make a difference?
Interesting. I got the following gdb outputs. Note that tag_get()
returns -1 and root_tag_get() returns 1048576.
(gdb) n
399 while (height > 0) {
(gdb) n
402 offset = (index >> shift) & RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK;
(gdb)
403 if (!tag_get(slot, tag, offset))
(gdb)
404 tag_set(slot, tag, offset);
(gdb) p tag_get(slot, tag, offset)
$14 = 0
(gdb) n
405 slot = slot->slots[offset];
(gdb) p tag_get(slot, tag, offset)
$15 = -1
(gdb) n
406 BUG_ON(slot == NULL);
(gdb) n
407 shift -= RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
(gdb) n
408 height--;
(gdb) n
399 while (height > 0) {
(gdb) n
412 if (slot && !root_tag_get(root, tag))
(gdb) p root_tag_get(root, tag)
$16 = 0
(gdb) n
413 root_tag_set(root, tag);
(gdb) n
415 return slot;
(gdb) p root_tag_get(root, tag)
$17 = 1048576
> > static inline void root_tag_set(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned int tag)
> > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline void root_tag_clear_all(st
> >
> > static inline int root_tag_get(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned int tag)
> > {
> > - return root->gfp_mask & (1 << (tag + __GFP_BITS_SHIFT));
> > + return !! (root->gfp_mask & (1 << (tag + __GFP_BITS_SHIFT)));
> > }
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-04 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060604084548.GA5609@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2006-06-04 8:45 ` [minor fix] radixtree: regulate tag get return value Wu Fengguang
2006-06-04 9:11 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20060604111754.GA5984@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2006-06-04 11:17 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2006-06-04 20:18 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20060604112636.GB5984@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2006-06-04 11:26 ` [PATCH] radixtree: normalize radix_tree_tag_get() " Wu Fengguang
2006-06-05 3:07 [minor fix] radixtree: regulate tag get " Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=349419864.11444@ustc.edu.cn \
--to=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox