From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/17] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 02:39:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3513cd3b-5b6a-4a3a-bf56-79bbd40b3bec@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804161447.84806-11-boqun@kernel.org>
Hi.
> diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
> index 33fc4c814a9f..8299657f0f86 100644
> --- a/include/linux/preempt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
> @@ -34,14 +34,31 @@
> * SOFTIRQ_MASK: 0x0000ff00
> * HARDIRQ_DISABLE_MASK: 0x00ff0000
> * HARDIRQ_MASK: 0x0f000000
> + *
> + * When HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS=y, PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED is put in a
> + * separate word and that allows 64bit load-store architectures to 'set'
> + * PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED without messing up the otherwise symmetric
> + * modifications used on preempt_count and still load the whole thing
> + * (single-copy) atomically, without having to resort to full atomic
> + * operations.
> + *
> + * Because of the above, NMI_MASK bits are different depending on
> + * HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS:
> + *
> + * - HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS=n:
> + *
> * NMI_MASK: 0x10000000
> * PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED: 0x80000000
> + *
> + * - HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS=y:
> + * NMI_MASK: 0xf0000000
> + * (PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED is in a different word)
> */
> #define PREEMPT_BITS 8
> #define SOFTIRQ_BITS 8
> #define HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS 8
> #define HARDIRQ_BITS 4
> -#define NMI_BITS 1
> +#define NMI_BITS (1 + 3*IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS))
>
Shouldn't testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h also be updated with
same?
> #define PREEMPT_SHIFT 0
> #define SOFTIRQ_SHIFT (PREEMPT_SHIFT + PREEMPT_BITS)
> @@ -116,8 +133,8 @@ static __always_inline unsigned char interrupt_context_level(void)
> * preempt_count() is commonly implemented with READ_ONCE().
> */
>
> -#define nmi_count() (preempt_count() & NMI_MASK)
> -#define hardirq_count() (preempt_count() & HARDIRQ_MASK)
> +#define nmi_count() (preempt_count() & NMI_MASK)
> +#define hardirq_count() (preempt_count() & HARDIRQ_MASK)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> # define softirq_count() (current->softirq_disable_cnt & SOFTIRQ_MASK)
> # define irq_count() ((preempt_count() & (NMI_MASK | HARDIRQ_MASK)) | softirq_count())
> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> index 88c594c6d7fc..35f546a042b1 100644
> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ config PREEMPT_RT_NEEDS_BH_LOCK
> config PREEMPT_COUNT
> bool
>
> +config HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
> + bool
> + depends on PREEMPT_COUNT && 64BIT
> +
> config PREEMPTION
> bool
> select PREEMPT_COUNT
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9b3f1764fa9e..6d88343c3bad 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5973,8 +5973,13 @@ void preempt_count_add(int val)
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> /*
> * Underflow?
> + *
> + * Cannot detect underflow based on the current preempt_count() value
> + * if using HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS because preempt count takes all 32
> + * bits.
> */
> - if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON((preempt_count() < 0)))
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS) &&
> + DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON((preempt_count() < 0)))
> return;
> #endif
> __preempt_count_add(val);
> @@ -6006,7 +6011,10 @@ void preempt_count_sub(int val)
> /*
> * Underflow?
> */
> - if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(val > preempt_count()))
> + unsigned int uval = val;
> + unsigned int pc = preempt_count();
> +
> + if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(pc - uval > pc))
> return;
> /*
> * Is the spinlock portion underflowing?
> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> index 0c9b2269a8d6..7980a4a232f9 100644
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,13 @@ void _local_interrupt_enable(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(_local_interrupt_enable);
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
> +/*
> + * Any 32bit architecture that still cares about performance should
> + * probably ensure this is near preempt_count.
> + */
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nmi_nesting);
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * SOFTIRQ_OFFSET usage:
> diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c
> index bfafe1204c7b..c3d976c801bb 100644
> --- a/lib/locking-selftest.c
> +++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c
> @@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ static int unexpected_testcase_failures;
>
> static void dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(void), int expected, int lockclass_mask)
> {
> - int saved_preempt_count = preempt_count();
> + long saved_preempt_count = preempt_count();
nit: Isn't preempt_count still returns int?
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> int saved_mgd_count = current->migration_disabled;
> int saved_rcu_count = current->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 16:14 [PATCH v4 00/17] Refcounted interrupt disable and SpinLockIrq for Rust Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] preempt: Track NMI nesting to separate per-CPU counter Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] preempt: Introduce HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 6:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-05 6:59 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub,add}_return() Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] openrisc: Include <linux/cpumask.h> in smp.h Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 18:20 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 18:26 ` [PATCH v4.1 " Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 20:51 ` [PATCH v4 " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-04 21:08 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 6:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-05 7:07 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 7:09 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 7:19 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 13:53 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 14:10 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 14:20 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 14:56 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 15:11 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 16:53 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 17:38 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] irq: Add KUnit test for refcounted interrupt enable/disable Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] locking: Switch to _irq_{disable,enable}() variants in cleanup guards Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] sched: Remove the unused preempt_offset parameter of __cant_sleep() Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] sched: Avoid signed comparison of preempt_count() in __cant_migrate() Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 20:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 6:54 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 7:15 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 7:27 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-06 0:58 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 21:09 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-08-04 23:14 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] arm64: sched/preempt: Enable HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] s390/preempt: " Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 20:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-05 12:37 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] rust: Introduce interrupt module Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] rust: helper: Add spin_{un,}lock_irq_{enable,disable}() helpers Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] rust: sync: Use super::* in spinlock.rs Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] rust: sync: Add SpinLockIrq Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] rust: sync: Introduce SpinLockIrq::lock_with() and friends Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3513cd3b-5b6a-4a3a-bf56-79bbd40b3bec@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox