From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: David Kahurani <k.kahurani@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, ericvh@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
syzbot+5e28cdb7ebd0f2389ca4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
asmadeus@codewreck.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in p9_client_destroy
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:48:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3597833.OkAhqpS0b6@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAZOf26g-L2nSV-Siw6mwWQv1nv6on8c0fWqB4bKmX73QAFzow@mail.gmail.com>
On Donnerstag, 24. März 2022 13:13:25 CET David Kahurani wrote:
> On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 4:38:57 AM UTC+3 asmadeus@codewreck.org
>
> wrote:
> > syzbot wrote on Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 04:53:29PM -0800:
> > > kmem_cache_destroy 9p-fcall-cache: Slab cache still has objects when
> > > called from p9_client_destroy+0x213/0x370 net/9p/client.c:1100
> >
> > hmm, there is no previous "Packet with tag %d has still references"
> > (sic) message, so this is probably because p9_tag_cleanup only relies on
> > rcu read lock for consistency, so even if the connection has been closed
> > above (clnt->trans_mode->close) there could have been a request sent
> > (= tag added) just before that which isn't visible on the destroying
> > side?
> >
> > I guess adding an rcu_barrier() is what makes most sense here to protect
> > this case?
> > I'll send a patch in the next few days unless it was a stupid idea.
>
> Looking at this brought me to the same conclusion.
>
> ---------------------
>
> From cd5a11207a140004bf55005fac7f7e4cec2fd075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Kahurani <k.kahurani@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:00:23 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] net/9p: Flush any delayed rce free
>
> As is best practice
>
> kmem_cache_destroy 9p-fcall-cache: Slab cache still has objects when called
> from p9_client_destroy+0x213/0x370 net/9p/client.c:1100
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3701 at mm/slab_common.c:502 kmem_cache_destroy
> mm/slab_common.c:502 [inline]
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3701 at mm/slab_common.c:502
> kmem_cache_destroy+0x13b/0x140 mm/slab_common.c:490
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 3701 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted
> 5.17.0-rc5-syzkaller-00021-g23d04328444a #0
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_destroy mm/slab_common.c:502 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_destroy+0x13b/0x140 mm/slab_common.c:490
> Code: da a8 0e 48 89 ee e8 44 6e 15 00 eb c1 c3 48 8b 55 58 48 c7 c6 60 cd
> b6 89 48 c7 c7 30 83 3a 8b 48 8b 4c 24 18 e8 9b 30 60 07 <0f> 0b eb a0 90
> 41 55 49 89 d5 41 54 49 89 f4 55 48 89 fd 53 48 83
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90002767cf0 EFLAGS: 00010282
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff920004ecfa5 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: ffff88801e56a280 RSI: ffffffff815f4b38 RDI: fffff520004ecf90
> RBP: ffff888020ba8b00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: ffffffff815ef1ce R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
> R13: ffffc90002767d68 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> FS: 00005555561b0400(0000) GS:ffff88802ca00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000555556ead708 CR3: 0000000068b97000 CR4: 0000000000150ef0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> p9_client_destroy+0x213/0x370 net/9p/client.c:1100
> v9fs_session_close+0x45/0x2d0 fs/9p/v9fs.c:504
> v9fs_kill_super+0x49/0x90 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:226
> deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:332
> deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:363
> cleanup_mnt+0x3a2/0x540 fs/namespace.c:1173
> task_work_run+0xdd/0x1a0 kernel/task_work.c:164
> tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
> exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:175 [inline]
> exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x27e/0x290 kernel/entry/common.c:207
> __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:289 [inline]
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x60 kernel/entry/common.c:300
> do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> RIP: 0033:0x7f5ff63ed4c7
> Code: ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 31 f6 e9 09
> 00 00 00 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 a6 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff
> ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007fff01862e98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f5ff63ed4c7
> RDX: 00007fff01862f6c RSI: 000000000000000a RDI: 00007fff01862f60
> RBP: 00007fff01862f60 R08: 00000000ffffffff R09: 00007fff01862d30
> R10: 00005555561b18b3 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f5ff64451ea
> R13: 00007fff01864020 R14: 00005555561b1810 R15: 00007fff01864060
> </TASK>
>
> Signed-off-by: David Kahurani <k.kahurani@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: syzbot+5e28cdb7ebd0f2389ca4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
I'm not absolutely sure that this will really fix this issue, but it seems to
be a good idea to add a rcu_barrier() call here nevertheless.
Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
> ---
> net/9p/client.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
> index 8bba0d9cf..67c51913a 100644
> --- a/net/9p/client.c
> +++ b/net/9p/client.c
> @@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ void p9_client_destroy(struct p9_client *clnt)
>
> p9_tag_cleanup(clnt);
>
> + rcu_barrier();
> kmem_cache_destroy(clnt->fcall_cache);
> kfree(clnt);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-26 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAAZOf26g-L2nSV-Siw6mwWQv1nv6on8c0fWqB4bKmX73QAFzow@mail.gmail.com>
2022-03-26 11:46 ` [syzbot] WARNING in p9_client_destroy David Kahurani
2022-03-26 11:48 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2022-03-26 12:24 ` asmadeus
2022-03-26 12:36 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-03-26 13:35 ` 9p fscache Duplicate cookie detected (Was: [syzbot] WARNING in p9_client_destroy) asmadeus
2022-03-30 12:21 ` 9p fs-cache tests/benchmark (was: 9p fscache Duplicate cookie detected) Christian Schoenebeck
2022-03-30 21:47 ` asmadeus
2022-04-01 14:19 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-01 23:11 ` asmadeus
2022-04-02 12:43 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-11 8:10 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 7:59 ` David Howells
2022-04-09 11:16 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-10 16:18 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-10 22:54 ` asmadeus
2022-04-11 13:41 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-12 22:38 ` asmadeus
2022-04-14 12:44 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-17 12:56 ` asmadeus
2022-04-17 13:52 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-17 21:22 ` asmadeus
2022-04-17 22:17 ` 9p EBADF with cache enabled (Was: 9p fs-cache tests/benchmark (was: 9p fscache Duplicate cookie detected)) asmadeus
2022-04-21 10:36 ` David Howells
2022-04-21 11:36 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-22 13:13 ` asmadeus
2022-04-25 14:10 ` David Howells
2022-04-26 15:38 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-05-03 10:21 ` asmadeus
2022-05-04 18:33 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-05-04 21:48 ` asmadeus
2022-05-06 19:14 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-03 16:46 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-12 10:02 ` asmadeus
2022-06-14 3:38 ` [PATCH] 9p: fix EBADF errors in cached mode Dominique Martinet
2022-06-14 3:41 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-14 12:10 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-14 12:45 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-14 14:11 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 13:35 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 13:51 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-16 14:11 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-16 20:14 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 20:53 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-16 21:10 ` [PATCH v3] " Dominique Martinet
2022-06-20 12:47 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-20 20:34 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-21 12:13 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 13:52 ` [PATCH v2] " Dominique Martinet
[not found] <20220725121931.2795-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-07-25 12:36 ` [syzbot] WARNING in p9_client_destroy syzbot
[not found] <20220725112124.2733-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-07-25 11:33 ` syzbot
[not found] <20220724125520.2680-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-07-24 13:27 ` syzbot
2022-02-28 0:53 syzbot
2022-02-28 1:38 ` asmadeus
2022-07-24 8:28 ` syzbot
2022-07-24 13:17 ` syzbot
2022-07-25 10:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-07-25 11:50 ` asmadeus
2022-07-25 12:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-26 12:09 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-07-29 12:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3597833.OkAhqpS0b6@silver \
--to=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=k.kahurani@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+5e28cdb7ebd0f2389ca4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).