From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5249C32788 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E6B20831 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="JAIvCevJ"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="JAIvCevJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 62E6B20831 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729967AbeKUB6C (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:58:02 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:57330 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725935AbeKUB6B (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:58:01 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E428D60B0D; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:28:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1542727700; bh=m0p22JJsxKd1q1uJL2YmVOjRbHzUu7zoN5ew8++y+/4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=JAIvCevJmrHjMXj8BdPXVHS/bVRpbtJsXKq1GVCKoHj4mn/j+ow3kWXvVLl4nfohk nGxgN4NtSQMLluzPLxiVLNcMe7raLg2wijZ0uq0sGAZ2eI9uAQyznjaL+A9AJiOLXx O9OVQEDPAxpaxlCTo3hlI4Dq7+brXM1EyGbPsi4E= Received: from [10.226.60.81] (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jhugo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D04B6020B; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:28:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1542727700; bh=m0p22JJsxKd1q1uJL2YmVOjRbHzUu7zoN5ew8++y+/4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=JAIvCevJmrHjMXj8BdPXVHS/bVRpbtJsXKq1GVCKoHj4mn/j+ow3kWXvVLl4nfohk nGxgN4NtSQMLluzPLxiVLNcMe7raLg2wijZ0uq0sGAZ2eI9uAQyznjaL+A9AJiOLXx O9OVQEDPAxpaxlCTo3hlI4Dq7+brXM1EyGbPsi4E= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 0D04B6020B Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jhugo@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Unify CPU topology across ARM64 & RISC-V To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Atish Patra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com, juri.lelli@arm.com, anup@brainfault.org, palmer@sifive.com, jeremy.linton@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mick@ics.forth.gr, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1541728209-3224-1-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> <07d92dd4-f943-47ee-e168-46bfaf4ed755@codeaurora.org> <20181120111146.GA6497@e107155-lin> From: Jeffrey Hugo Message-ID: <35b92f83-dbbf-fad2-561f-49b0933ffe19@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:28:18 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181120111146.GA6497@e107155-lin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/20/2018 4:11 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:31:33AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote: > > [...] > >> >> I was interested in testing these on QDF2400, an ARM64 platform, since this >> series touches core ARM64 code and I'd hate to see a regression. However, I >> can't figure out what baseline to use to apply these. Different patches >> cause different conflicts of a variety of baselines I attempted. >> > > Good to know that we can test DT configuration on QDF2400. I always assumed > it's ACPI only. It is ACPI only in the production configuration. I suppose we could hack things up to do basic DT sanity, but I expect it would be nasty and non-trivial. > >> What are these intended to apply to? >> > > The series alone may not get the package/socket ids correct on QDF2400. > I have not yet added support for the same as I wanted to get the initial > feedback on DT bindings. The movement of DT binding and corresponding > code should not regress and you should be able to validate only that > part. > On a cursory glance, it looks like some of the reorganized code would also be used in the ACPI path (things that are common between DT and ACPI). I do not expect problems, but I still feel its prudent to do a sanity check on actual hardware. -- Jeffrey Hugo Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.