From: Jon Masters <jonmasters@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
Cc: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Thomas Habets <thomas@habets.pp.se>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom_pardon, aka don't kill my xlock
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:59:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35fb2e5904092708594f50f25d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040927133554.GD30956@logos.cnet>
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:35:54 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti
<marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 02:12:26PM +0100, Jon Masters wrote:
> > What would be wrong with having the page reclaim algorithms use one of
> > the low memory watermarks as a trigger to call in to userspace to
> > extend the swap available if possible? This is probably what Microsoft
> > et al do with their "Windows is extending your virtual memory
> You dont to change kernel code for that - make a script to monitor
> swap usage, as soon as it gets below a given watermark, you swapon
> whatever swapfile you want.
Assuming the machine's not swapping itself to death, but I suppose
you're right anyway. I'll have a look at writing something for proof
of concept.
Jon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-27 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-22 23:23 [PATCH] oom_pardon, aka don't kill my xlock Thomas Habets
2004-09-23 0:01 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-23 0:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-23 4:45 ` Tonnerre
2004-09-23 6:57 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-23 12:24 ` Tonnerre
2004-09-23 13:32 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-23 23:45 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-09-24 13:19 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-24 19:58 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-24 21:15 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-25 10:08 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-27 10:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-27 12:54 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-27 13:12 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-27 12:36 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-27 13:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-27 15:59 ` Jon Masters [this message]
2004-09-27 17:12 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-27 16:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-28 13:33 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-28 12:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-28 23:55 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-27 23:07 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-29 0:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-09-24 14:07 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-24 22:57 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-25 16:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-27 12:00 Thomas Habets
2004-09-27 12:17 ` Jon Masters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35fb2e5904092708594f50f25d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jonmasters@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=thomas@habets.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox