From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: recalc_sigpending() / recalc_sigpending_tsk() ?
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:26:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <365.1014920818@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202280854250.15607-100000@home.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202280854250.15607-100000@home.transmeta.com>
torvalds@transmeta.com said:
> Not a chance in hell. The backwards compatibility looks like a
> trivial one-liner:
> compat-2.4.h:
> #define recalc_sigpending() recalc_sigpending(current)
> so what are you complaining about?
Fine. I was trying to define a back-compat version of recalc_sigpending_tsk()
too, before going through all the code and changing recalc_sigpending(current)
to recalc_sigpending and recalc_sigpending(other) to recalc_sigpending_tsk()
- but as you rightly point out there's no justification for using the latter
in any of the driver or fs code that I'm trying to support - and hence it
isn't present, and doesn't need the compat support.
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-28 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-28 16:31 recalc_sigpending() / recalc_sigpending_tsk() ? David Woodhouse
2002-02-28 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-28 18:26 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2002-03-01 15:33 ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-01 15:33 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-01 15:37 ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-01 15:49 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-01 16:28 ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-01 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-01 17:05 ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-01 17:40 ` David Howells
2002-03-01 17:43 ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-01 19:01 ` [PATCH] small proposal Martin Dalecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=365.1014920818@redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox