From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752129AbbASPTe (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:19:34 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:50702 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751501AbbASPTc (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:19:32 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Will Deacon , Joerg Roedel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Thierry Reding , Matt Wagantall , Robert Elliott , Andrew Morton , Mitchel Humpherys Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] iopoll: Introduce memory-mapped IO polling macros Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:19:18 +0100 Message-ID: <3657890.a3eGsv4NQj@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150119144028.GA2373@arm.com> References: <1418687243-16395-1-git-send-email-mitchelh@codeaurora.org> <20150119124348.GA2806@suse.de> <20150119144028.GA2373@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mr5CSKyuQAS0ZqYt/2DmTqq/pj8hXmrg4GqTFe+A7D3PfydAFts WgdPrgurCDwhKfsDOdt5bCHpxi6jwacNU/tiWdlMxUID1bjD8Jz+cP5ZMeA5GLD/UqA0rya Jh866tUpONP1dWiy/ZCoq0NzsvqF6i2Ololzqy4txZ79izUMIktifV8vWUGqqcWIEsbUcbs VBFRnQAVv7TrM2cYgSkzg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 19 January 2015 14:40:28 Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:43:48PM +0000, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:25:11AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > If you get an Ack from any of Arnd/Joerg/akpm then I'm happy to take it via > > > the arm-smmu pull (along with the patch making use of it). > > > > > > Joerg, would you be ok with that? > > > > I am ok with that, but like to have another Ack for it. > > That's fair enough. > > Arnd, could you take another look at this patch please? You had some > comments in the past. No further objections from my side. I don't think it's really needed, but it seems harmless, so Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann