From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752492AbcAELqv (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:46:51 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:52043 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752423AbcAELqm convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:46:42 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Pali =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Laura Abbott , Tony Lindgren , Sebastian Reichel , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Devicetree Spec List , Rob Herring , Pavel Machek , Grant Likely , Russell King , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm: devtree: Set system_rev from DT "/revision" Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:45:52 +0100 Message-ID: <3663322.UyrB2OmX6o@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160105113750.GL22661@pali> References: <1436214373-12969-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <50067860.qzAxcgo8L4@wuerfel> <20160105113750.GL22661@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:aRQTgmJw4mU0E/XlAnnB6peXE2jRRKi2K9ffDqchoQcmnqEhFDC MjkmZj0sYesPrw9AdtXyDlWMOgZyzaCITaV2rGerjBNm1buxFQxNi77HbTbT6SAwaNJGqJX g06XTRkA8CHtMQNEnhkxG5BkzTpS6TPsZIUlwfBQE0qiDSPwnCU3kWQf51Hb9M6MHHAi5FM UaYrSJsuwekTGfCs6G5PA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hsnU86llVqk=:ir27WVHM4K4Z7ilc9rpFbH xBgaLNep/o/r/nXTBRgEr2AfrIeG0w9xTAaVdfWd46NYUy0YIBVDbdsy29WcbzaC0295CCAV+ Q9zYb5IkjnBvrR8FA6skBDWy9r7CPvn83W5bQUDotSRjm/xqpJLWMbw579AruQj5zHo+gNSyt 1mWa1KBXiWsdRhb8/VXf/oct76qmnnbiiNiZGPJ7DfSiRgS83K12/0CpuiEmNGln6fMiPFTm2 UtNBNqZjXAIA4u4KSFWBGBqEO9xjYIKixVf576A7acJIwWIYCoe/nR0loa7iwWwFHAL88Sf22 9zS1A9EB0SgSCP8D7mVQYWrbQAUVkF0JYll1/y12GJDGJMOi8wOyVpToUUuQc0RsqMHBKwX/z 58Sm8+jmK/r6C0DA+K2C2OBDa9Rs9ZXXwQsZlKQwqEXYzDR52Zd+TkR63uace9t6Q6MlyY6sF oRBpkZ5NKxe08RvPsDEJ9fEAD/q6NzFCFAkSRelfNxOPLBtaaduW/ELSqrldcr95m7TCWeoiN HGl4YeXE5m+yiXhIFEX/+fNXSnF4ywh58l1cBCOr6bnIdL/onXuRbQzmIoCg+r1dsojhI8wHQ KmnTqxQbdov01KkML1RtnzGH5okygpXVONJjaIH6pJodAu9Ss5jLabYHBGyPBlW9NIHzpCcr2 9JH/9tRUVBImgTbFgd1kaf4rKtPomtSic4q5okRWdcBX2QOdYWqC08TwAmuDv21DXJZbFTxK7 u44dtz/r+5WKALyS Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 05 January 2016 12:37:50 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 28 December 2015 23:27:17 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 28 December 2015 13:01:22 Frank Rowand wrote: > > > > > > Patch 2/5 copies the value from ATAG_REVISION into the fdt "/revision" > > > property. > > > > > > If the use of /revision is limited to being a location to hold an ATAG > > > value to pass to the global variable system_rev, then it would make > > > sense to just copy directly from the ATAG value into system_rev in the > > > same board file where you are copying the ATAGs. > > > > Agreed. That would be simpler, and avoid a situation where someone relies > > on the /revision property in DT to be set from the atags compat code > > (preventing an upgrade to a newer bootloader), or on the system_rev variable > > to be the same across multiple boot loaders, in the absence of other > > kernel code setting it. > > So, set system_rev only for Nokia N900? At same place where is called > save_atags()? > > Yes. Arnd