From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netcube.li (mail.netcube.li [173.249.15.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B593FD528; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 21:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.249.15.149 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735852196; cv=none; b=jw+JdGzbgDYbOaPRYRSdj27ugvv0hC5WZ9Y/buQsm6+Lh7qN1V+3k+PTqdg+fjAvZL4xrjmZSzDfqe4Z4aY6acqGw5RU4RNIX50XYcc2fI85Rm9ajguXW2xnfctGysU7wjIlVycVoV3eWPdUOiKeI7BLxc35ouICpnjsn/oMwlI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735852196; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YsxxKXpp0OaUGXsO+hlNiGelg0TfQZIzkDNWw1QQg48=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=i2z/cAFLAlsSvgjRqT40hV42ldRc/0wmiI9TIhRWY6LqjzVZVwMebU0cAexZhq7q7BRnIumawmIFJAWBJxZWUfbA+VCzDf1zdMpymtGk2AaW/BJLD2skwlB2GCyiWOSQmg1kfn4QsqRJQgOk3bjWoMf085ZI54yx4OtVVFsgj+Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=netcube.li; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netcube.li; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netcube.li header.i=@netcube.li header.b=Vn/xKSj+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.249.15.149 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=netcube.li Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netcube.li Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netcube.li header.i=@netcube.li header.b="Vn/xKSj+" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=netcube.li; s=s1; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References; bh=RSTBStxhzyR+6+FFM24DzymWvE+CP0/qXEeLu3rO9mU=; b=Vn/xKSj+oPkTQxwKb6Pt6A3BgAuqF/RnqKnt+PN38Vkhbjiwp4bSc+uOInNz1E9aRmD4j9aU/N/AsaN/lpRUsi+mrCRhi2gPOW7sY+eleVPRkyKroVQMyNq7mQ7ldjM5ag3/bzwvb6RkhsYbvkVLZOfpj0x4PGxXHk/SgVXWEsc= Received: from webmail.netcube.li (WIN-IJ7TS3MJ5LT [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netcube.li with ESMTPA ; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 22:09:28 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 22:09:27 +0100 From: Lukas Schmid To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Maxime Ripard , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add NetCube Systems Austria name In-Reply-To: <459cfaff-4f3b-46ac-9b4e-b794cb3968d4@kernel.org> References: <32b5c286-9457-4b93-a93f-c8aff356ec10@kernel.org> <20250102175006.3675-1-lukas.schmid@netcube.li> <20250102175006.3675-2-lukas.schmid@netcube.li> <478a6364-0537-453a-881f-c460de2f67a8@kernel.org> <7bcb73f5-26ae-4bdd-9bb4-afc1c5b9fc0d@kernel.org> <26cbf302f615bec3ed6496f04425edc7@netcube.li> <459cfaff-4f3b-46ac-9b4e-b794cb3968d4@kernel.org> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11 Message-ID: <36651dffdddb8e1781ce929f14a11cc1@netcube.li> X-Sender: lukas.schmid@netcube.li Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 2025-01-02 21:59, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On 02/01/2025 19:48, Lukas Schmid wrote: >> Am 2025-01-02 19:31, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: >>> On 02/01/2025 19:24, Lukas Schmid wrote: >>>> Am 2025-01-02 18:57, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: >>>>> On 02/01/2025 18:49, Lukas Schmid wrote: >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Schmid >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++ >>>>> >>>>> You did not read really the messages we gave you... >>>>> >>>>> 1. Read what I wrote in my first reply for v1. I gave detailed >>>>> instruction to avoid the exact mistake you now did. >>>>> >>>>> 2. Read again Andre's reply. >>>>> >>>>> 3. Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads >>>>> (unrelated or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox >>>>> and >>>>> might interfere with applying entire sets. >>>>> >>>>> 4. Next version, with proper cover letter, is after 24h, so you >>>>> have >>>>> some time to digest the feedback. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Krzysztof >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Thank you for your feedback, and I sincerely apologize for the >>>> mistakes >>>> in my submission process. >>>> >>>> I did read Andre's reply and your feedback on v1, but unfortunately, >>>> I >>>> had already sent the v2 series as a reply before fully understanding >>>> all >>>> the recommendations. I realize now that this was a misstep and >>>> caused >>>> confusion. >>>> >>>> I will wait until tomorrow, around 20:00, to send the v3 series. I >>>> will >>>> make sure to include a proper cover letter and ensure that all the >>>> feedback from v1 and v2 is addressed. >>>> >>>> Regarding the v1 feedback, I thought I had incorporated all your >>>> suggestions. However, after rereading it, I seem to have missed >>>> something critical. Could you please point out what I might have >>>> overlooked? I want to make sure I fully understand and correct it in >>>> the >>>> next iteration. >>>> >>> Please read my full reply for v1 of this patch. How did you implement >>> that feedback - long instruction? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Krzysztof >> >> I assume by 'long instruction' you mean checking the devicetree using >> 'make dtbs_check W=1'. > > There was nothing like that. Again, we talk about this patch, not > other. > You refer now to other patch. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Oh I see now. It's about the Acked-by. I have already added it to the commit-message of my clone. The V3 will have those two included. I have read the message from Andre, but unfortunately had already sent the new patches before I got the mail. I have already applied the tags. Best regards, Lukas