From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Fix WARN_ON in iommu probe path
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:47:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3674a075-d305-4cd7-be44-8d808f872249@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240407011429.136282-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
On 4/7/24 9:14 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Commit 1a75cc710b95 ("iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu probed
> devices") adds all devices probed by the iommu driver in a rbtree
> indexed by the source ID of each device. It assumes that each device
> has a unique source ID. This assumption is incorrect and the VT-d
> spec doesn't state this requirement either.
>
> The reason for using a rbtree to track devices is to look up the device
> with PCI bus and devfunc in the paths of handling ATS invalidation time
> out error and the PRI I/O page faults. Both are PCI ATS feature related.
>
> Only track the devices that have PCI ATS capabilities in the rbtree to
> avoid unnecessary WARN_ON in the iommu probe path. Otherwise, on some
> platforms below kernel splat will be displayed and the iommu probe results
> in failure.
>
> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 166 at drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c:158 intel_iommu_probe_device+0x319/0xd90
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? __warn+0x7e/0x180
> ? intel_iommu_probe_device+0x319/0xd90
> ? report_bug+0x1f8/0x200
> ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70
> ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70
> ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
> ? intel_iommu_probe_device+0x319/0xd90
> ? debug_mutex_init+0x37/0x50
> __iommu_probe_device+0xf2/0x4f0
> iommu_probe_device+0x22/0x70
> iommu_bus_notifier+0x1e/0x40
> notifier_call_chain+0x46/0x150
> blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x42/0x60
> bus_notify+0x2f/0x50
> device_add+0x5ed/0x7e0
> platform_device_add+0xf5/0x240
> mfd_add_devices+0x3f9/0x500
> ? preempt_count_add+0x4c/0xa0
> ? up_write+0xa2/0x1b0
> ? __debugfs_create_file+0xe3/0x150
> intel_lpss_probe+0x49f/0x5b0
> ? pci_conf1_write+0xa3/0xf0
> intel_lpss_pci_probe+0xcf/0x110 [intel_lpss_pci]
> pci_device_probe+0x95/0x120
> really_probe+0xd9/0x370
> ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10
> __driver_probe_device+0x73/0x150
> driver_probe_device+0x19/0xa0
> __driver_attach+0xb6/0x180
> ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10
> bus_for_each_dev+0x77/0xd0
> bus_add_driver+0x114/0x210
> driver_register+0x5b/0x110
> ? __pfx_intel_lpss_pci_driver_init+0x10/0x10 [intel_lpss_pci]
> do_one_initcall+0x57/0x2b0
> ? kmalloc_trace+0x21e/0x280
> ? do_init_module+0x1e/0x210
> do_init_module+0x5f/0x210
> load_module+0x1d37/0x1fc0
> ? init_module_from_file+0x86/0xd0
> init_module_from_file+0x86/0xd0
> idempotent_init_module+0x17c/0x230
> __x64_sys_finit_module+0x56/0xb0
> do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x140
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
>
> Fixes: 1a75cc710b95 ("iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu probed devices")
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
This patch closes a boot bug described here.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10689
I will queue it for v6.9-rc if no objection.
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-07 1:14 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Fix WARN_ON in iommu probe path Lu Baolu
2024-04-08 3:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-08 7:15 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-08 9:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-11 12:29 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-04-11 2:47 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2024-04-11 6:53 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3674a075-d305-4cd7-be44-8d808f872249@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox