The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Emre Cecanpunar <emreleno@gmail.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	 LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	krishna.chomal108@gmail.com,  radheykalra901@gmail.com,
	edip@medip.dev, hello@kursatabayli.dev,  mjg59@srcf.ucam.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jorge.lopez2@hp.com,  jes965@nyu.edu,
	mario.limonciello@amd.com, julien.robin28@free.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] platform/x86: hp-wmi: normalize GPU thermal mode errors
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:57:39 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <36e76e24-07bb-9a2f-72cd-b50591cd71b4@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4dcb4c0b0aac63d03b8e8a3c68e41b88b8d303e6.1784195117.git.emreleno@gmail.com>

On Thu, 16 Jul 2026, Emre Cecanpunar wrote:

> The GPU thermal mode helpers return positive firmware error codes, but
> their callers only treat negative values as failures. If the mode query
> is rejected, its output parameters remain uninitialized and are then
> used to select a profile or sent back to firmware as the GPU slowdown
> temperature. A rejected mode update is likewise reported as successful.

Does this happen with some HW? Please add the info.

> Zero the query buffer and convert positive firmware status codes to
> -EINVAL in both helpers so callers never consume missing output or ignore
> a failed update.
> 
> Fixes: 6e4ab59b8391 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: Add fan and thermal profile support for Victus 16-s1000")
> Signed-off-by: Emre Cecanpunar <emreleno@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-wmi.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-wmi.c
> index 29881749aae6..65c3bac17ad6 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp-wmi.c
> @@ -1885,20 +1885,21 @@ static int victus_s_gpu_thermal_profile_get(bool *ctgp_enable,
>  					    u8 *dstate,
>  					    u8 *gpu_slowdown_temp)
>  {
> -	struct victus_gpu_power_modes gpu_power_modes;
> +	struct victus_gpu_power_modes gpu_power_modes = {};

Why is this necessary if you return error after the if change?

>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = hp_wmi_perform_query(HPWMI_GET_GPU_THERMAL_MODES_QUERY, HPWMI_GM,
>  				   &gpu_power_modes, sizeof(gpu_power_modes),
>  				   sizeof(gpu_power_modes));
> -	if (ret == 0) {
> -		*ctgp_enable = gpu_power_modes.ctgp_enable ? true : false;
> -		*ppab_enable = gpu_power_modes.ppab_enable ? true : false;
> -		*dstate = gpu_power_modes.dstate;
> -		*gpu_slowdown_temp = gpu_power_modes.gpu_slowdown_temp;
> -	}
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EINVAL;

Use two separate ifs instead.

> -	return ret;
> +	*ctgp_enable = gpu_power_modes.ctgp_enable ? true : false;
> +	*ppab_enable = gpu_power_modes.ppab_enable ? true : false;
> +	*dstate = gpu_power_modes.dstate;
> +	*gpu_slowdown_temp = gpu_power_modes.gpu_slowdown_temp;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int victus_s_gpu_thermal_profile_set(bool ctgp_enable,
> @@ -1929,8 +1930,10 @@ static int victus_s_gpu_thermal_profile_set(bool ctgp_enable,
>  
>  	ret = hp_wmi_perform_query(HPWMI_SET_GPU_THERMAL_MODES_QUERY, HPWMI_GM,
>  				   &gpu_power_modes, sizeof(gpu_power_modes), 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EINVAL;
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;

Now this could be:

	if (ret > 0)
		return -EINVAL;

	return ret;

-- 
 i.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-21 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-16  9:54 [PATCH 0/5] platform/x86: hp-wmi: Fix WMI error handling Emre Cecanpunar
2026-07-16  9:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] platform/x86: hp-wmi: validate WMI response header size Emre Cecanpunar
2026-07-21 15:42   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-16  9:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] platform/x86: hp-wmi: handle firmware errors in tablet mode query Emre Cecanpunar
2026-07-21 15:50   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-16  9:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] platform/x86: hp-wmi: handle errors in the OMEN key event Emre Cecanpunar
2026-07-21 15:52   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-16  9:54 ` [PATCH 4/5] platform/x86: hp-wmi: normalize GPU thermal mode errors Emre Cecanpunar
2026-07-21 15:57   ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-07-16  9:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] platform/x86: hp-wmi: report fan speed command failures Emre Cecanpunar
2026-07-21 15:58   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-21 16:14 ` [PATCH 0/5] platform/x86: hp-wmi: Fix WMI error handling Emre Cecanpunar
2026-07-21 16:15 ` Emre Cecanpunar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=36e76e24-07bb-9a2f-72cd-b50591cd71b4@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=edip@medip.dev \
    --cc=emreleno@gmail.com \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=hello@kursatabayli.dev \
    --cc=jes965@nyu.edu \
    --cc=jorge.lopez2@hp.com \
    --cc=julien.robin28@free.fr \
    --cc=krishna.chomal108@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=radheykalra901@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox