From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, steved@redhat.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no,
aviro@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@redhat.com, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #2]
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:45:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3718.1141299945@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060301162113.774d1745.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> The number of rejects gets into the "I'm not confident it'll work after
> this" territory.
>
> Here's Trond's current diff:
I assume this is you applying these patches to your -mm tree (which contains
some of Trond's patches), rather than Linus's tree or Trond's tree.
Can you be more specific about which patches you've got problems with? Is it
mainly that patch 5/5 and little bits of patch 2/5 don't apply?
There's a problem here in that your tree is incompatible with Linus's tree in
various ways. I believe you've said before that you prefer the patches you're
given to have been made against Linus's tree... is that right?
Also, do you yet have a git tree holding your patchset? If not, have you
considered using stacked git (StGIT) to provide one?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-02 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-01 17:36 [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #2] David Howells
2006-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] NFS: Permit filesystem to override root dentry on mount " David Howells
2006-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] NFS: Apply mount root dentry override to filesystems " David Howells
2006-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation " David Howells
2006-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] NFS: Add dentry materialisation op " David Howells
2006-03-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] NFS: Unify NFS superblocks per-protocol per-server " David Howells
2006-03-02 0:21 ` [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing " Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 11:04 ` David Howells
2006-03-02 17:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 11:45 ` David Howells [this message]
2006-03-02 17:28 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 17:57 ` David Howells
2006-03-02 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3718.1141299945@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox