From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751972AbWCBLp4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:45:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751777AbWCBLp4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:45:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:11434 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751972AbWCBLpy (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:45:54 -0500 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20060301162113.774d1745.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060301162113.774d1745.akpm@osdl.org> <20060301173617.16639.83553.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, steved@redhat.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, aviro@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #2] X-Mailer: MH-E 7.92+cvs; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50.4 Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:45:45 +0000 Message-ID: <3718.1141299945@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > The number of rejects gets into the "I'm not confident it'll work after > this" territory. > > Here's Trond's current diff: I assume this is you applying these patches to your -mm tree (which contains some of Trond's patches), rather than Linus's tree or Trond's tree. Can you be more specific about which patches you've got problems with? Is it mainly that patch 5/5 and little bits of patch 2/5 don't apply? There's a problem here in that your tree is incompatible with Linus's tree in various ways. I believe you've said before that you prefer the patches you're given to have been made against Linus's tree... is that right? Also, do you yet have a git tree holding your patchset? If not, have you considered using stacked git (StGIT) to provide one? David