From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 22:06:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 22:06:19 -0400 Received: from zok.SGI.COM ([204.94.215.101]:23170 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 22:06:18 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: "J.A. Magallon" , Lista Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] PentiumPro/II split in x86 config In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 27 May 2002 22:29:25 -0300." <20020528012925.GB20729@conectiva.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 12:05:54 +1000 Message-ID: <3720.1022551554@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 May 2002 22:29:25 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Since you're working on this could I suggest that you use labeled >elements, this gccism make the initialization above way more cleaner, safer and >easy to read :-) This is being used in the kernel in places like the FSes, the >TCP/IP stack and lots of other places. >+ vendor: X86_VENDOR_INTEL, >+ family: 5, Better still, use the C language standard: .vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL, .family = 5,