From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261742AbUKPTph (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:45:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261770AbUKPTnq (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:43:46 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:11156 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261742AbUKPTl4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:41:56 -0500 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20041116112022.67be2377.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20041116112022.67be2377.akpm@osdl.org> <2315.1100630906@redhat.com> To: Andrew Morton Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Making compound pages mandatory User-Agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:41:47 +0000 Message-ID: <3725.1100634107@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Andrea wants to do that, purely from a code coverage point of view. But it > does add a little extra overhead. It definitely does. > For what reason do you propose this? You and Christoph, amongst others, seemed dead in favour of it. Other than that, I have no real need for it, except that it makes kobjsize() simpler. David