From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
hdegoede@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com,
mgross@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] platform/x86: Add Intel Software Defined Silicon driver
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 05:23:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <372f76f7b1b7cf3d0ca38a7a84bcc23322ff12ed.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa16191c1241473fbfd55995bbba37bd2ab4a41c.camel@perches.com>
On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 02:14 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 21:30 -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> > Intel Software Defined Silicon (SDSi) is a post manufacturing mechanism for
> > activating additional silicon features. Features are enabled through a
> > license activation process.
>
> Why isn't this a user process and not a kernel one?
This is a mechanism for provisioning CPU features during runtime. It requires a
driver to access the functionality. That functionality is discovered on a multi
functional PCI device that is owned by the upstream intel_vsec driver.
>
> > V5
> > - Update kernel version to 5.18 in API doc and copyrights to 2022.
> > - Remove unneeded prototypes.
> > - In binary attribute handlers where ret is only used for errors,
> > replace,
> > return (ret < 0) ? ret : size;
> > with,
> > return ret ?: size;
>
> I think this style overly tricky.
>
> Why not the canonical:
>
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> return size;
I can see not using the 2 parameter shortcut of the ternary operator, but the
regular 3 parameter expression is easy to read for simple operations.
David
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-04 5:30 [PATCH V5 0/3] Intel Software Defined Silicon David E. Box
2022-02-04 5:30 ` [PATCH V5 1/3] platform/x86: Add Intel Software Defined Silicon driver David E. Box
2022-02-04 6:57 ` Greg KH
2022-02-04 10:14 ` Joe Perches
2022-02-04 13:23 ` David E. Box [this message]
2022-02-04 13:43 ` Greg KH
2022-02-04 14:01 ` Joe Perches
2022-02-04 17:01 ` David E. Box
2022-02-04 5:30 ` [PATCH V5 2/3] tools arch x86: Add Intel SDSi provisiong tool David E. Box
2022-02-04 5:30 ` [PATCH V5 3/3] selftests: sdsi: test sysfs setup David E. Box
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=372f76f7b1b7cf3d0ca38a7a84bcc23322ff12ed.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox