From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Tkhai Kirill <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Rework migrate_tasks()
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:20:54 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3732251402489254@web2m.yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140611112411.GA21191@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
11.06.2014, 15:24, "Srikar Dronamraju" <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> * Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> [2014-06-11 13:52:10]:
>> Currently migrate_tasks() skips throttled tasks,
>> because they are not pickable by pick_next_task().
>
> Before migrate_tasks() is called, we do call set_rq_offline(), in
> migration_call().
>
> Shouldnt this take care of unthrottling the tasks and making sure that
> they can be picked by pick_next_task().
If we do this separate for every class, we'll have to do this 3 times.
Furthermore, deadline class does not have a list of throttled tasks.
So we'll have to the same as I did: to lock tasklist_lock and to iterate
throw all of the tasks in the system just to found deadline tasks.
>> These tasks stay on dead cpu even after they
>> becomes unthrottled. They are not schedulable
>> till user manually changes their affinity or till
>> cpu becomes alive again.
>
> If we are still seeing tasks not being picked by pick_next_task(), then
> can it probably mean that rq->rd was NULL?
Unthrottle functions dl_task_timer() and unthrottle_cfs_rq() put tasks and
queues back. They do not look at rq->rd.
do_sched_rt_period_timer() does not unthrottle dead queue at all (they
are excluded from rd).
Thanks,
Kirill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-11 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20140611093417.27807.2288.stgit@tkhai>
2014-06-11 9:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: Rework migrate_tasks() Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-11 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-11 11:15 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-11 11:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-06-11 12:20 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2014-06-11 13:15 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-06-11 13:43 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-11 19:33 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-12 2:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-06-17 12:56 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-11 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Rework check_for_tasks() Kirill Tkhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3732251402489254@web2m.yandex.ru \
--to=tkhai@yandex.ru \
--cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox