From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F2F2C326A; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758020854; cv=none; b=igE9tZWFnYo2o6hgl6JiSa1WlBIP5/pevqpPkOj4b6yxzeC/MCVukw17KEUHaPOMCoh2SZIR5DlfBMgBwJ8QXWEIZmU1K6zTWSW7uWnlPFmwZ1T8OLW0/KifVXaZCL0PySCtqpiGiZ68DxO6+g6CW9d9HCVSnmfrFbIFkmg/TOg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758020854; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vzmJG5u/sRXgQZLCCiK76Lv86OedG0wC0sx/S9n6ERs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=RGR576LLjif6r9hPuN2lHgsxo2owEPaFPqwlhgccJcySyDX4CxQA3UgF6Vpy32qNm8c1ocdZn/sH7/jVpK40T56qcw+FM40JdfIOjFCRMy30YN0zu0RzhBOzUq6t2ySuY6Bibs7f4gnIAKu+I8j8BE5FAnzjID7bTHqGOLNWckA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b=NREOhVlQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="NREOhVlQ" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279870.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 58GAFeTO013413; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:07:22 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh= ASNNcIT47VlnynwXxXbDXqQp6nlLqMabjaPkliTdKEM=; b=NREOhVlQYuHTHeXQ TfCUe/YTKBGwss/6wKjfKooqA+f3nRp5g6/0yrUa3AScz+6jaiCjRC/2vMqy1dNJ uS/uV2HjZqPf4lUj+eeC0UUiY6+qi/pZGoHaaPhw4Lo6G67G/8T1vcSVdg8jsteZ zdi12nSQY+hahmd/3t4gSNxNv1tm145aPGsnbQRuO17K8LZ2N2io7TQqTRj6kaeC QKVkz6vnPZoaXz9vgcw/dDDKeiV3X49GOUEaoNjLU5ZGab/GPSZ1iqDgBo4fDzIG 72H0ZCGQG1hskpDIM2QkMAxaIgTzpTUit3w8gYl4zocmDR5KsYLe8JPObDd79H4V jv37ig== Received: from nalasppmta02.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 496x5asrgx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:07:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.97.35]) by NALASPPMTA02.qualcomm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 58GB7Lwp012630 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:07:21 GMT Received: from [10.206.103.106] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1748.24; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 04:07:15 -0700 Message-ID: <373bbb78-2b0c-446c-be97-53b82edeed64@quicinc.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:37:02 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document qcs8300 compatible To: Rob Herring , Vikram Sharma CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Ravi Shankar References: <20250912141134.2799078-1-quic_vikramsa@quicinc.com> <20250912141134.2799078-2-quic_vikramsa@quicinc.com> <20250916024858.GA3574831-robh@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Nihal Kumar Gupta In-Reply-To: <20250916024858.GA3574831-robh@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) To nalasex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.35) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 5yqcY2aSDhVn6h5OJHJQ1dsS8np66V0n X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 5yqcY2aSDhVn6h5OJHJQ1dsS8np66V0n X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUwOTE2MDAxMCBTYWx0ZWRfX0KYdeFpVhe+C VWdu50kVq5BCuNsoVXL3/1DiQo11Vvjuc6C8xgjEodCtF9z0ze+raflgAr8YNyfXvWipODXcuut ayUj8zrXvU5FyVOiJjRBoZ+r18f4gIFl1WKtoDahvsI56pw5PxTguV3dg6Ut+ZtSEPRcWQ+sulQ fmYEVE+9YXLJPAh35kzx9AASvJmCARovQA8t1TdjuGo1rL97mKwNynk1zsXFHtc7GlAhD0FYCVX 8tcMqBIIy2lMbPVaI70/KggqJPry2BxFNd46hV5ahfJd+cqgRBL5JZkuI0zobFiuRija8fX8YH2 5pceXpGZYvh0sRZlUcbUMCxtWp1+InZFtaLfrMmhFSSqpj03ETzEecIyOrBjQFym1NdkAXfh+6T hZNwpitu X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=WpQrMcfv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=68c944ea cx=c_pps a=ouPCqIW2jiPt+lZRy3xVPw==:117 a=ouPCqIW2jiPt+lZRy3xVPw==:17 a=GEpy-HfZoHoA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=yJojWOMRYYMA:10 a=COk6AnOGAAAA:8 a=KKAkSRfTAAAA:8 a=gvTuqyW5XoP_ZPETEvsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=TjNXssC_j7lpFel5tvFf:22 a=cvBusfyB2V15izCimMoJ:22 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1117,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-09-16_02,2025-09-12_01,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2507300000 definitions=main-2509160010 On 16-09-2025 08:18, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:41:32PM +0530, Vikram Sharma wrote: >> From: Nihal Kumar Gupta >> >> Add device tree bindings for the CCI controller on the >> Qualcomm QCS8300 SoC. >> Introduce the "qcom,qcs8300-cci" compatible string. > Wrap commit messages at 72 chars. And explain how it's the same or > different from existing SoCs in the commit message. Don't explain the > diff. We can read that ourselves. > SA8775P(Lemans) has 4 CCIs, while QCS8300 (Monaco) has 3 CCI, with the only difference being the GPIOs used for SDA/SCL pins. Currently, the CCI driver probe happens through the "qcom,msm8996-cci" compatible string. Could we use the existing SA8775P compatible string "qcom,sa8775p-cci" or we should remove it? Please advise on the preferred approach for upstream compliance. >> Signed-off-by: Nihal Kumar Gupta >> Signed-off-by: Vikram Sharma >> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Regards, Nihal Kumar Gupta