From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S269226AbRGaJ3c>; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 05:29:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S269230AbRGaJ3W>; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 05:29:22 -0400
Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:62726 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S269227AbRGaJ3I>;
	Tue, 31 Jul 2001 05:29:08 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: software_iq@TheOffice.net
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Kernel 2.4.8-pre2 Compile Attempts 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 31 Jul 2001 02:31:25 EST."
             <3B66187D.17040.4C80F5@localhost> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 19:29:09 +1000
Message-ID: <3760.996571749@ocs3.ocs-net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing

On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 02:31:25 -0500, 
"John L. Males" <software_iq@TheOffice.net> wrote:
>Without giving the gory details, I am curious to know if there are
>still problems compiling the 2.4.8-pre2 kernel (2.4.7 + 2.4.8-pre2
>patch)....  Also what is installed in /lib/modules
>tree is not just modules, but some extensive set of the kernel source
>tree with object code mixed in for adventure of finding.
>
>Am I completely out to lunch
>here, or should I just hang in.  I am doing ok with the 2.2.19 

You are out to lunch, or rather your programs are.  Upgrade all your
utilities to the values listed in Documentation/Changes.