public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
Cc: Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@nxp.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: chipidea: Configure DMA properties and ops from DT
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:28:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3761533.8BImebjOQF@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160318015414.GA30851@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net>

On Friday 18 March 2016 09:54:14 Peter Chen wrote:
> > 
> > I don't think it's a very widespread problem, there are only very few
> > developers that intentionally use this method, and some use the
> > platform_device_register_full() call to create a device with a known
> > mask, which is generally ok for the limited case where the driver
> > is only ever going to run on a single platform, but not in the
> > more general case that of_dma_configure is designed to handle.
> 
> Even only for qualcomm platforms, it may be possible have different
> DMA masks at ARM64 platforms, so we may can't use a fixed value
> at glue layer driver. So, using of_dma_configure is suitable choice
> for DT platforms for this case, right?

Yes.

> > I think we should fix the drivers to consistently use the device
> > that was created by the platform (DT or ACPI or board file)
> > to pass that into the DMA API, anything else will just cause
> > more subtle bugs.
> > 
> 
> Although I don't know what kinds of bugs it may have, it may be
> met before, otherwise, why most of platform drivers need to call
> dma_set_coherent_mask or dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent explicitly

Any driver that wants to do 64-bit addressing on DMA should call
dma_set_mask()/dma_set_coherent_mask() on its device and check the
return code.

No driver should call dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() on its own
device, it's basically always a bug and we named the function
to make that more obvious. The problem with dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent()
is that it just overrides whatever the platform knows about the
device when the driver thinks it knows better. 

The reason for having those calls in a lot of drivers is that
traditionally, ARM platforms booting with DT did not set up any DMA
mask and the drivers worked around it by manually setting up a mask
that happened to work for them (almost all 32-bit ARM devices need
a 32-bit mask without coherency or offset or iommu, so that's easy).
We now call of_dma_configure() for all devices that get probed from
DT, so we should be removing those calls.

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-18  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-22  5:32 [PATCH] usb: chipidea: Configure DMA properties and ops from DT Bjorn Andersson
2016-02-22  6:02 ` Peter Chen
2016-02-22  6:14   ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-02-22 10:03 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-02-22 22:07   ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-02-23  1:31     ` Peter Chen
2016-03-02 22:59     ` Li Yang
2016-03-08 19:52       ` Li Yang
2016-03-09  3:40         ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-03-09 23:16           ` Li Yang
2016-03-14 10:51             ` Peter Chen
2016-03-17 15:52               ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-18  1:54                 ` Peter Chen
2016-03-18  3:25                   ` Rajesh Bhagat
2016-03-18  7:28                   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-03-18 10:56                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-03-25  4:02           ` Peter Chen
2016-03-25  4:39             ` [PATCH 1/1] usb: chipidea: add DMA mask configuration API kbuild test robot
2016-10-21 16:59 ` [RESEND PATCH] usb: chipidea: Configure DMA properties and ops from DT Bjorn Andersson
2016-10-21 17:38   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-21 17:53     ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-10-22  6:22     ` Sriram Dash

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3761533.8BImebjOQF@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=Peter.Chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
    --cc=leoli@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox