From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751493AbXCEDht (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:37:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751497AbXCEDht (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:37:49 -0500 Received: from web52508.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.48.191]:27438 "HELO web52508.mail.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751493AbXCEDhs (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:37:48 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ci8F0xqx9D2Z5LK8SUSofBkYjB0MB7wVeuzjt7TLUj76W0tCyUDCWpGtQPF36r2W0EV5CY0RKSQO7i+bRb6QjynUwn/eFWG8b87Ao2kQitR78YKrVn84KJpRtC7kKxsyfUyrJkUk6sjq4aq42RZpoHa6sLyYaeoCi90mN0HLrXw=; X-YMail-OSG: 4CfDdvgVM1kVpKQDuqmvNEddPe8ZIxtl5GZMhw7veON3IUDVa5pOKqaVF23Jc5cL7Qbh9Xeev3GLHi5NmCr1YiikRK0ONdOGU3HXTa60j6Nyf6w93QEvNlxszXOJ.ZwyKosnOUPZITJXsrzQ5VbDNyMctA-- Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:37:47 -0800 (PST) From: Marc Perkel Subject: Re: Raid 10 Problems? To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <382470.25191.qm@web52508.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Mar 4 2007 19:17, Marc Perkel wrote: > >Thanks - because of your suggestion I had found the > >instructions. But you have some interesting options > >set. > > > >-N nicearray -b internal -e 1.0 > > > >Are these important? > > -N? What's in a name? I suppose, it's not so > important. > (Arrays are identified by their UUID anyway. But > maybe > udev can do something with the name someday as it > does > today with /dev/disk/*.) Not worth starting over for. > > -b internal -- seems like a good idea to speed up > resynchronization. I'm trying to figure out what the default is. > > -e 1.0 -- I wonder why the new superblock format > is > not default in mdadm (0.90 is still used). > Looks interesting for big arrays but not sure it's worth starting over for. Trying to get through a 2 hour sync using 4 500gb sata 2 drives. > > >pci=nommconf iommu=soft > > The nvidia chipset corruption problem? > Yep - that's the one. ____________________________________________________________________________________ It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/