public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] remove the limit max_sectors_kb imposed on max_readahead_kb
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:25:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <384930723.12146@ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
Message-ID: <20070720112528.GC6300@mail.ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070720110743.GT11657@kernel.dk>

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20 2007, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Remove the size limit max_sectors_kb imposed on max_readahead_kb.
> > 
> > max_sectors_kb cannot grow larger than max_hw_sectors_kb, which can be
> > rather small for some disk drives.
> 
> Please CC me on core block layer changes, thanks.

OK.

> The patch looks fine though! Your reasoning is a bit odd, though. I
> think the depency between the two is just wrong and ugly, so I agree it
> should go.
> 
> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

Thank you :-)


      reply	other threads:[~2007-07-20 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070720100740.106917381@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] readahead cleanups and interleaved readahead Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20070720101123.936159499@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-20 10:07   ` [PATCH 1/6] compacting file_ra_state Fengguang Wu
     [not found]     ` <p73y7hbux4d.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
     [not found]       ` <20070720121143.GA8584@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-20 12:11         ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 16:02           ` Linus Torvalds
     [not found]   ` <1184927207.20032.168.camel@twins>
2007-07-20 10:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]       ` <20070720112409.GB6300@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-20 11:24         ` Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20070720101124.083676724@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-20 10:07   ` [PATCH 2/6] mmap read-around simplification Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20070720101124.221472134@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-20 10:07   ` [PATCH 3/6] remove several readahead macros Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20070720101124.470940735@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-20 10:07   ` [PATCH 5/6] introduce radix_tree_scan_hole() Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20070720101124.600141268@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-20 10:07   ` [PATCH 6/6] basic support of interleaved reads Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20070720101124.350754890@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-20 10:07   ` [PATCH 4/6] remove the limit max_sectors_kb imposed on max_readahead_kb Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 11:07   ` Jens Axboe
     [not found]     ` <20070720112528.GC6300@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-20 11:25       ` Fengguang Wu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=384930723.12146@ustc.edu.cn \
    --to=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox