From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756807AbYIDIEg (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 04:04:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753552AbYIDIET (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 04:04:19 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:31045 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751047AbYIDIEQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 04:04:16 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=wIi8qOEpAEeR5H4d4a+O68rV06qxlwFx/es7P3qQkyNLlUmsoT1EtAmnsxCG9R076h 0/ZYjNrG5POh1/K6cRzwgFrvwHjExxhqikoPAEb5V+5YTkAt6qwAXK+1XVcOLe+3mYVk Btj1pkUB1NE/ZmeLCYkfnF4ds6lm8NE3Ng+8I= Message-ID: <38b2ab8a0809040104v58bd2d4t8435fd9707ec7d72@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:04:14 +0200 From: "Francis Moreau" To: "Jean Delvare" Subject: Re: qestion about I2C_CLASS_HWMON flag Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <20080904095829.76a5c3ed@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <38b2ab8a0809040043g7f944872l47f84c53bb213829@mail.gmail.com> <20080904095829.76a5c3ed@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Jean, On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Dear Francis, > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:43:10 +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: >> I'm wondering why does this flag exist ? >> >> Why is a hw monitor device so special so that an I2C bus needs >> a flag to tell the rest of the world that it support it ? > > This is a question for the i2c mailing list. > you're right, I'm going to repost on the correct resort. thanks -- Francis