Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/amd/uncore: use kcalloc() instead of multiplication

["Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>]

On 9/13/2025 2:35 PM, Joey Pabalinas wrote:
> Dynamic size calculations should not be performed in allocator
> function arguments due to overflow risk.
>
> Use kcalloc() instead of multiplication in the first argument
> of kzalloc().
>
> Signed-off-by: Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c
> index e8b6af199c738eb00b..d08e3054461f2ca07a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c
> @@ -1036,11 +1036,11 @@ int amd_uncore_umc_ctx_init(struct amd_uncore *uncore, unsigned int cpu)
>  		group_num_pmus[gid] = hweight32(info.split.aux_data);
>  		group_num_pmcs[gid] = info.split.num_pmcs;
>  		uncore->num_pmus += group_num_pmus[gid];
>  	}
>  
> -	uncore->pmus = kzalloc(sizeof(*uncore->pmus) * uncore->num_pmus,
> +	uncore->pmus = kcalloc(uncore->num_pmus, sizeof(*uncore->pmus),
>  			       GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!uncore->pmus) {
>  		uncore->num_pmus = 0;
>  		goto done;
>  	}

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>