Re: [RFC] I/O Access Abstractions

[David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>]

> The question I think being ignored here is. Why not leave things as is. The
> multiple bus stuff is a port specific detail hidden behind readb() and
> friends.

This isn't so much for the case where the address generation is done by a
simple addition. That could be optimised away by the compiler with an entirely
inline function (as per David Woodhouse's suggestion).

It's far more important for non-x86 platforms which only have a single address
space and have to fold multiple external address spaces into it.

For example, one board I've got doesn't allow you to do a straight
memory-mapped I/O access to your PCI device directly, but have to reposition a
window in the CPU's memory space over part of the PCI memory space first, and
then hold a spinlock whilst you do it.

David