Re: [RESEND][PATCHv2] cpupower: Correct return type of cpu_power_is_cpu_online in cpufreq

Thomas Renninger
2016-10-24T15:11:36Z

On Thursday, October 20, 2016 01:42:49 PM Shilpasri G Bhat wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 04:23 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > When converting to a shared library in ac5a181d065d ("cpupower: Add
> > cpuidle parts into library"), cpu_freq_cpu_exists was converted to
> > cpupower_is_cpu_online. cpu_req_cpu_exists returned 0 on success and
> > -ENOSYS on failure whereas cpupower_is_cpu_online returns 1 on success.
> > Check for the correct return value in cpufreq-set.
> >
> > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374212
> >
> > Fixes: ac5a181d065d ("cpupower: Add cpuidle parts into library")
> > Reported-by: Julian Seward <jseward@acm.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Drop another redundant cpupower_is_cpu_online
>
> Reviewed-by:Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.com>

I wanted to go through all recently sent patches and adjust rebase them to
my lates changes.
But I guess the fact that I push this from day to day because of other
stuff should not hold off such important fixes.

I collect and review all others as well the next day(s)..

Thomas