From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261307AbVBRH3Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:29:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261306AbVBRH3Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:29:24 -0500 Received: from simmts7.bellnexxia.net ([206.47.199.165]:28056 "EHLO simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261305AbVBRH3V (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:29:21 -0500 Message-ID: <3923.10.10.10.24.1108711618.squirrel@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20050218040010.GA6166@thunk.org> References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <4214CC9B.7090001@nortel.com> <3757.10.10.10.24.1108659538.squirrel@linux1> <200502171825.08631.tomlins@cam.org> <1742.10.10.10.24.1108683124.squirrel@linux1> <20050218040010.GA6166@thunk.org> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:26:58 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed From: "Sean" To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: "Ed Tomlinson" , "Chris Friesen" , "Lee Revell" , "d.c" , cs@tequila.co.jp, galibert@pobox.com, kernel@crazytrain.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-7 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, February 17, 2005 11:00 pm, Theodore Ts'o said: > If you think that, you truly do not understand the value of BK, and > why Linus chose it. Hey Ted, No, I just disagree that it was an absolute requirement or worth its cost that so many want to completely discount. Andrew has pretty much shown BK is not required, he's still using patches. Cheers, Sean