Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-18T19:26:22Z

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:34:23 -0500 (EST), Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> On Fri, February 18, 2005 11:27 am, Theodore Ts'o said:
>
> > If you truly believe that BK would be able to add the value that it
> > does to the kernel development process by using some other SCM as the
> > master SCM, with BK being "underneath", as you proposed earlier, then
> > you do not understand why BK is fundamentally better than the current
> > open source SCM systems that are out there.
>
> BK already feeds patches out at the head, surely if it's as powerful as
> you think, it could feed a free SCM too for your non-bk friends in the
> community.

What is bk2cvs gateway that is maintained by Larry then? Just call it
your "head" that Linus feeds from his BK repository and you are all
set.

I can see that Roman and Stellian want something different, but we
alerady have what you have just described.

--
Dmitry