public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] readahead: simplify readahead call scheme
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:59:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <397806667.68964@ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
Message-ID: <20071216120417.586021813@mail.ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20071216115927.986126305@mail.ustc.edu.cn

[-- Attachment #1: readahead-merge-sync-async.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1668 bytes --]

It is insane and error-prone to insist on the call sites to check for async
readahead after doing any sync one. I.e. whenever someone do a sync readahead:

				if (!page)
					page_cache_sync_readahead(...);

He must try async readahead, too:

				page = find_get_page(...);
				if (PageReadahead(page))
					page_cache_async_readahead(...);

The tricky point is that PG_readahead could be set by a sync readahead for the
_current_ newly faulted in page, and the readahead code simply expects one more
callback to handle it. If the caller fails to do so, it will miss the
PG_readahead bits and never able to start an async readahead.

Avoid it by piggy-backing the async part _inside_ the readahead code.

Now if an async readahead should be started immediately after a sync one,
the readahead logic itself will do it. So the following code becomes valid:

				if (!page)
					page_cache_sync_readahead(...);
				else if (PageReadahead(page))
					page_cache_async_readahead(...);

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
 mm/readahead.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- linux-2.6.24-rc4-mm1.orig/mm/readahead.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc4-mm1/mm/readahead.c
@@ -402,6 +402,14 @@ ondemand_readahead(struct address_space 
 	ra->async_size = ra->size > req_size ? ra->size - req_size : ra->size;
 
 readit:
+	/*
+	 * An async readahead should be triggered immediately.
+	 * Instead of demanding all call sites to check for async readahead
+	 * immediate after a sync one, start the async part now and here.
+	 */
+	if (!hit_readahead_marker && ra->size == ra->async_size)
+		ra->size *= 2;
+
 	return ra_submit(ra, mapping, filp);
 }
 

-- 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-16 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20071216115927.986126305@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-16 11:59 ` [PATCH 0/9] mmap read-around and readahead Fengguang Wu
2007-12-16 23:35   ` Linus Torvalds
     [not found]     ` <E1J4atl-0000UI-4a@localhost>
2007-12-18 11:46       ` Fengguang Wu
     [not found]     ` <20071218114609.GA27778@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
     [not found]       ` <E1J4bK6-0001BG-Mp@localhost>
2007-12-18 12:13         ` Fengguang Wu
     [not found]     ` <E1J4tUN-0002IB-F6@localhost>
2007-12-19  7:37       ` Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20071216120417.586021813@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-16 11:59   ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
     [not found] ` <20071216120417.905514988@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-16 11:59   ` [PATCH 3/9] readahead: auto detection of sequential mmap reads Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20071216120418.055796608@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-16 11:59   ` [PATCH 4/9] readahead: quick startup on sequential mmap readahead Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20071216120418.201213716@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-16 11:59   ` [PATCH 5/9] readahead: make ra_submit() non-static Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20071216120418.360445517@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-16 11:59   ` [PATCH 6/9] readahead: save mmap read-around states in file_ra_state Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20071216120418.498110756@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-16 11:59   ` [PATCH 7/9] readahead: remove unused do_page_cache_readahead() Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20071216120418.639781633@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-16 11:59   ` [PATCH 8/9] readahead: move max_sane_readahead() calls into force_page_cache_readahead() Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20071216120418.787765636@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-16 11:59   ` [PATCH 9/9] readahead: call max_sane_readahead() in ondemand_readahead() Fengguang Wu
     [not found] ` <20071216120417.748714367@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-16 11:59   ` [PATCH 2/9] readahead: clean up and simplify the code for filemap page fault readahead Fengguang Wu
2007-12-18  8:19   ` Nick Piggin
     [not found]     ` <E1J4ay1-0000ak-3e@localhost>
2007-12-18 11:50       ` Fengguang Wu
2007-12-18 23:54       ` Nick Piggin
     [not found]         ` <E1J4spp-0001pR-JQ@localhost>
2007-12-19  6:55           ` Fengguang Wu
     [not found] <20071222013147.897522982@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
     [not found] ` <20071222013314.546311527@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-12-22  1:31   ` [PATCH 1/9] readahead: simplify readahead call scheme Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=397806667.68964@ustc.edu.cn \
    --to=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox