From: "Mohammad A. Haque" <mhaque@haque.net>
To: caperry@edolnx.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is IPv4 totally broken in 2.4-test
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:25:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39FE49D1.27AABA3F@haque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39FE5C09.F1B13725@edolnx.net>
if [ -f /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn ]
then
echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
fi
or dont compile with ECN support int he kernel.
Carl Perry wrote:
>
> I have test9 running in an original Athlon 500, a PII 300, and a K6-2/400. All
> of them are experiencing the same problems with networking. I confimred that
> this is not happening to just my, as my buddy in a far away (California) land is
> experiencing the same thing. I cannot connect to ubid.com, landsend.com,
> etrade.com, travelocity.com, and a slew of others. I'm not sure if this is
> because all of those sites are going "Wow! His IP stack conforms to _STANDARDS_
> - it must be fake" or what. However, it's really starting to get on my nerves.
>
> All of the above boxes are based on SuSE 6.4. Using the latest modutils,
> binutils 2.10, and egcs-1.1.2 (Which I think is still compiler gratas) My
> buddy's box is a Mandrake 7.1 box. I know he was using gcc-2.95.2 and an old
> binutils, but he has changed to egcs-1.1.2 and a newer binutils. He's still
> having the same problem. I pretty sure it's not an iptables issue, since I
> believe that he has iptables off. I also tried no tables on my K6-2 box with
> the same effects.
>
> Is anyone else experiencing these problems? Does anyone know if certain
> firewalls don't like 2.4 with a passion? Even better, does anyone know how to
> fix it?
>
> BTW: I have narrowed this down to a 2.4 problem. If I load 2.2 on any of those
> machines on the same ISP it doesn't work.
>
> Any ideas?
> --
> -Carl Perry
> caperry@edolnx.net
>
> "Real programmers don't draw flowcharts. Flowcharts are, after
> all, the illiterate's form of documentation. Cavemen drew
> flowcharts; look how much good it did them."
> -Fortune (The App, not the Magazine)
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/
mhaque@haque.net
"Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead
Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/
batmanppc@themes.org
=====================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-31 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-31 5:43 Is IPv4 totally broken in 2.4-test Carl Perry
2000-10-31 4:04 ` David S. Miller
2000-10-31 5:53 ` Carl Perry
2000-10-31 4:16 ` David S. Miller
2000-10-31 4:36 ` Gregory Maxwell
2000-10-31 4:25 ` Mohammad A. Haque [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39FE49D1.27AABA3F@haque.net \
--to=mhaque@haque.net \
--cc=caperry@edolnx.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox