From: Carl Perry <caperry@edolnx.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Is IPv4 totally broken in 2.4-test
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:43:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39FE5C09.F1B13725@edolnx.net> (raw)
I have test9 running in an original Athlon 500, a PII 300, and a K6-2/400. All
of them are experiencing the same problems with networking. I confimred that
this is not happening to just my, as my buddy in a far away (California) land is
experiencing the same thing. I cannot connect to ubid.com, landsend.com,
etrade.com, travelocity.com, and a slew of others. I'm not sure if this is
because all of those sites are going "Wow! His IP stack conforms to _STANDARDS_
- it must be fake" or what. However, it's really starting to get on my nerves.
All of the above boxes are based on SuSE 6.4. Using the latest modutils,
binutils 2.10, and egcs-1.1.2 (Which I think is still compiler gratas) My
buddy's box is a Mandrake 7.1 box. I know he was using gcc-2.95.2 and an old
binutils, but he has changed to egcs-1.1.2 and a newer binutils. He's still
having the same problem. I pretty sure it's not an iptables issue, since I
believe that he has iptables off. I also tried no tables on my K6-2 box with
the same effects.
Is anyone else experiencing these problems? Does anyone know if certain
firewalls don't like 2.4 with a passion? Even better, does anyone know how to
fix it?
BTW: I have narrowed this down to a 2.4 problem. If I load 2.2 on any of those
machines on the same ISP it doesn't work.
Any ideas?
--
-Carl Perry
caperry@edolnx.net
"Real programmers don't draw flowcharts. Flowcharts are, after
all, the illiterate's form of documentation. Cavemen drew
flowcharts; look how much good it did them."
-Fortune (The App, not the Magazine)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next reply other threads:[~2000-10-31 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-31 5:43 Carl Perry [this message]
2000-10-31 4:04 ` Is IPv4 totally broken in 2.4-test David S. Miller
2000-10-31 5:53 ` Carl Perry
2000-10-31 4:16 ` David S. Miller
2000-10-31 4:36 ` Gregory Maxwell
2000-10-31 4:25 ` Mohammad A. Haque
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39FE5C09.F1B13725@edolnx.net \
--to=caperry@edolnx.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox