public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com>
To: <andrew@lunn.ch>, <olteanv@gmail.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<Woojung.Huh@microchip.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<o.rempel@pengutronix.de>, <edumazet@google.com>,
	<f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <kernel@pengutronix.de>, <dsahern@kernel.org>, <san@skov.dk>,
	<willemb@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <horms@kernel.org>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: dsa: microchip: init predictable IPV to queue mapping for all non KSZ8xxx variants
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 03:41:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39a736262d87b06ad65e67753c440a1d489c8f8c.camel@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405095216.353829-9-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>

Hi Oleksij,

> +static int ksz9477_set_default_prio_queue_mapping(struct ksz_device
> *dev,
> +                                                 int port)
> +{
> +       u32 queue_map = 0;
> +       int ipv;

Just a suggestion for readability: if you can use common variable for
counter variable like cnt or n similar to return variable ret, it will
be easier to follow instead of ipv here, queue in other function. 

> +
> +       for (ipv = 0; ipv < dev->info->num_ipvs; ipv++) {
> +               int queue;
> +
> +               /* Traffic Type (TT) is corresponding to the Internal
> Priority
> +                * Value (IPV) in the switch. Traffic Class (TC) is
> +                * corresponding to the queue in the switch.
> +                */
> +               queue = ieee8021q_tt_to_tc(ipv, dev->info-
> >num_tx_queues);
> +               if (queue < 0)
> +                       return queue;

what happens if the num_tx_queues value passed is other than 1 to 8.
For ex: if it is 9, then ieee8021q_tt_to_tc( ) generates pr_warn as
invalid number of queue and return queue as 0. if will not execute, so
queue_map will be updated. Do we need check for valid range of values
instead of just queue < 0. 

Not sure this scenario can occur.  

> +
> +               queue_map |= queue << (ipv * KSZ9477_PORT_TC_MAP_S);
> +       }
> +
> +       return ksz_pwrite32(dev, port, KSZ9477_PORT_MRI_TC_MAP__4,
> queue_map);
> +}
> +
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08  3:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-05  9:52 [PATCH net-next v3 0/9] Enhanced DCB and DSCP Support for KSZ Switches Oleksij Rempel
2024-04-05  9:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/9] net: dsa: add support for DCB get/set apptrust configuration Oleksij Rempel
2024-04-05  9:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/9] net: dsa: microchip: add IPV information support Oleksij Rempel
2024-04-05  9:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/9] net: add IEEE 802.1q specific helpers Oleksij Rempel
2024-04-05  9:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/9] net: dsa: microchip: add multi queue support for KSZ88X3 variants Oleksij Rempel
2024-04-05  9:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/9] net: dsa: microchip: add support for different DCB app configurations Oleksij Rempel
2024-04-05  9:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/9] net: dsa: microchip: dcb: add special handling for KSZ88X3 family Oleksij Rempel
2024-04-05  9:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/9] net: dsa: microchip: enable ETS support for KSZ989X variants Oleksij Rempel
2024-04-08  3:52   ` Arun.Ramadoss
2024-04-05  9:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: dsa: microchip: init predictable IPV to queue mapping for all non KSZ8xxx variants Oleksij Rempel
2024-04-08  3:41   ` Arun.Ramadoss [this message]
2024-04-08  5:00     ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-04-05  9:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3 9/9] net: dsa: microchip: let DCB code do PCP and DSCP policy configuration Oleksij Rempel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39a736262d87b06ad65e67753c440a1d489c8f8c.camel@microchip.com \
    --to=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=Woojung.Huh@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=san@skov.dk \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox