From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-170.mta1.migadu.com (out-170.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2713A2E1EE5 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 13:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774532668; cv=none; b=WzHznprRutXIkj1Jjinhd7p2Yzt8mh0qj2P42ROYBcu5r1hNpyVR5hdD0XafluutXdZ4s9OdZ3cHE5RauO0OJwuvHy9vJJJ4twQ+NeKbMpUf/fb34W4Ut460elwDNoou0TOyDEMY+GWUo09WZrFGzrQ2CHZG3egxr9hICzBdYFw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774532668; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ew/Q3m7U+lO4YgU4uvx7Upq5ty6V9+n/JqWNR6xxuQg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=dtSwd1V2W/PUJDMKnQ5DDO0tgyUspnU3hEVL/cFNABW90ITmPebqn1KSBLy/lsWohxnTwo6zGP8/jlwm/kEMs5CKH9mjUavgjCZxS7+k6ouWeiueqxi7JvG7jDrOXMHJefeiTSDhPXUzW6/Ug2jmmyUhXZxOKM4GVGr8ZjGa6SQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=LsNyKgWe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="LsNyKgWe" Message-ID: <39c100fe-1f6f-46d2-8dd5-cf82320508ff@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1774532655; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=K03odWVdcWJvYNK2crB2kHPKb7HJfs7rp0mRh5FSdFM=; b=LsNyKgWeX3kOe1qqaQwzKw05d0myOG8pxI8Te81T0fqtaK2Z1jmM2YXV4NksELckKXzMWO Bl7LYSk1OaQ2XGN3v8ElkhQGgs2K/kVcRtPkFquRuQJODmOHraK2wFIdZo6dZtFMFhPRFD di9WdJh2gzBBiHYxaE4yfqnvrxTVXLg= Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 21:43:22 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: fix data race in fib6_metric_set() using cmpxchg To: Hangbin Liu , Eric Dumazet Cc: "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , David Ahern , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fei Liu References: <20260326-b4-fib6_metric_set-kmemleak-v1-1-c89fc1b312c0@gmail.com> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Jiayuan Chen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 3/26/26 9:13 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 05:05:57AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c >>> index dd26657b6a4a..64de761f40d5 100644 >>> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c >>> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c >>> @@ -730,14 +730,16 @@ void fib6_metric_set(struct fib6_info *f6i, int metric, u32 val) >>> if (!f6i) >>> return; >>> >>> - if (f6i->fib6_metrics == &dst_default_metrics) { >>> + if (READ_ONCE(f6i->fib6_metrics) == &dst_default_metrics) { >>> + struct dst_metrics *dflt = (struct dst_metrics *)&dst_default_metrics; >>> struct dst_metrics *p = kzalloc_obj(*p, GFP_ATOMIC); >>> >>> if (!p) >>> return; >>> >>> refcount_set(&p->refcnt, 1); >>> - f6i->fib6_metrics = p; >>> + if (cmpxchg(&f6i->fib6_metrics, dflt, p) != dflt) >>> + kfree(p); >>> } >>> >> The following line should happen before the cmpxchg(), >> ->metrics[X] accesses also need READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations. > Hi Eric, > > Jiayuan also suggested to using READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() for metrics[X] > accesses. But I don't get why this line should happen before the cmpxchg(), > Would you please help explain? I think what Eric means is something like this: ...         struct dst_metrics *p = kzalloc_obj(*p, GFP_ATOMIC);         if (!p)             return;         p->metrics[metric - 1] = val;         refcount_set(&p->refcnt, 1);         if (cmpxchg(&f6i->fib6_metrics, dflt, p) != dflt)             kfree(p);         else             return;     } } m = READ_ONCE(f6i->fib6_metrics); WRITE_ONCE(m->metrics[metric - 1], val); Since p is private data before being published via cmpxchg(), we can safely initialize its metrics beforehand. This way we don't need to worry about concurrent access to f6i->fib6_metrics->metrics[] during initialization. Right?